• Thank you for visiting HeavyEquipmentForums.com! Our objective is to provide industry professionals a place to gather to exchange questions, answers and ideas. We welcome you to register using the "Register" icon at the top of the page. We'd appreciate any help you can offer in spreading the word of our new site. The more members that join, the bigger resource for all to enjoy. Thank you!

Junkyard's work thread.....maybe haha

Truck Shop

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 7, 2015
Messages
17,017
Location
WWW.
Well they better figure out how to make that potato masher make more HP and Torque or it won't sell worth Sh!t.----Fact. But the biggest problem with engines like that
are too many moving parts, always has been. First lesson for a design engineer-Keep it simple.

Truck Shop
 

John C.

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2007
Messages
12,870
Location
Northwest
Occupation
Machinery & Equipment Appraiser
The other issue was there was no electric starter big enough to turn that monster 8 1/8 engine over fast enough to start it. All I've worked on or seen was an air start with air directly injected into the cylinders. Each engine had a huge air tank in the space that was fed by the same air pressure they used to fire torpedoes with. I don't remember the high pressure but the start pressure in the tank was around 300 PSI.

Last item is the physical size of opposed piston engines. Two cranks makes for a tall motor. Here is a photo of some surplussed Fairbanks engines.

Fairbanks01 copy.JPG
 

old-iron-habit

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 22, 2012
Messages
4,233
Location
Moose Lake, MN
Occupation
Retired Cons't. Supt./Hospitals
The other issue was there was no electric starter big enough to turn that monster 8 1/8 engine over fast enough to start it. All I've worked on or seen was an air start with air directly injected into the cylinders. Each engine had a huge air tank in the space that was fed by the same air pressure they used to fire torpedoes with. I don't remember the high pressure but the start pressure in the tank was around 300 PSI.

Last item is the physical size of opposed piston engines. Two cranks makes for a tall motor. Here is a photo of some surplussed Fairbanks engines.

View attachment 188908


Looks like the ones they took out of our local municipal power house about 15 years ago. Our city owned utility buys power normally but fired up our generators manually when the weather got bad and power outages were more often than not going to happen. I would have liked to have scored one but they cut them up in place for scrap and ease to remove them. Now we got 3 automated 3516 Cats for backup to the purchased power from the big box store utility.
 

Truck Shop

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 7, 2015
Messages
17,017
Location
WWW.
I was wondering about the physical size myself, as small as the engine compartments are on trucks these days and all the crap piled on the outside of that engine it must
be a real turd to work on. The DD15 is bad enough jammed in a Cascadia. Look at the PacCar engine flop.

Thread Hi-Jack

Truck Shop
 

DMiller

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 21, 2010
Messages
16,591
Location
Hermann, Missouri
Occupation
Cheap "old" Geezer
The Colt Pielstick engine/generators we had at the nuke were started by Compressed Air, had two compressor/receiver systems permanently married with multiple cross connect prevention systems, way too over engineered. Worked off 650psig average pressure, minimum for a roll off was 450psig. Had three rolls capability before ran too low to roll it off. They are actually sold/serviced by Fairbanks Morse in the US. Had to be up, running at speed(514RPM) and loading the emergency systems on the buss in 14 seconds, 6.2mw generators.

 

hvy 1ton

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 24, 2006
Messages
1,947
Location
Lawrence, KS
Cummins picked up a DOD contract last year to design an opposed cylinder diesel for use in armored fighting vehicles. Looks like the contract was a joint venture between Cummins and Achates.
 

willie59

Administrator
Joined
Dec 21, 2008
Messages
13,400
Location
Knoxville TN
Occupation
Service Manager
I'm going deep into the cobwebs in my head, and I may be full of beans, but didn't the Brit's make some kind of crazy engine like the horizontal opposed engine being discussed here?
 

John C.

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2007
Messages
12,870
Location
Northwest
Occupation
Machinery & Equipment Appraiser
I seem to remember the slang name for the Brit engine was a comerknocker. I saw a video on here somewhere of a truck with one I think. Most likely something Nige posted.
 

DMiller

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 21, 2010
Messages
16,591
Location
Hermann, Missouri
Occupation
Cheap "old" Geezer
BTW in that picture I posted, the Green pipe is 8" schedule 40 steel, the system it is off of is the Intercooler heat exchanger, the one at the end of the engine is the jacket water and there is a third LARGER unit on the opposite side Engine Oil cooler(the radiators for this). There is a manual Stop Bypass handle, I enjoyed being the tech to Test that function with the engine under full power, took Both hands and a braced foot to pull the governor off full fuel to bring the big pig to a stop. The governor is just to the left of that stop lever, Isochronous Woodward. The Yellow pipes are fuel, the air start feed is the lines converging on the T with the red handled half turn valves under the governor and lube oil pump. 750 gallons engine oil in this one.
 
Last edited:

John C.

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2007
Messages
12,870
Location
Northwest
Occupation
Machinery & Equipment Appraiser
The Fairbanks were about the same in size but didn't put out as much horsepower. The two in my photo probably were around 1,000 horses while the gen sets on the ship I was on were 1,450. The Pielstick when I got out of the service was advertised as one horse per cubic inch. We had Woodwards on those as well but the manual stop was a rack trip lever. Push the button on the end and move the short lever to stop and you could feel the snap as the racks dropped to no fuel. The Fairbanks on the ship had dry sump oil systems and the oil was held in a tank on the upper level of the space. It was 350 gallons and it really sucked to change oil. It had to be done with a little back and forth handle on a pump mounted on the wall putting out maybe a quart of oil with each stroke.

That's an great photo. Those monster engines are impressive but today you see the same output in a lot smaller packages.
 

StanRUS

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2016
Messages
767
Location
Cal
Cummins picked up a DOD contract last year to design an opposed cylinder diesel for use in armored fighting vehicles. Looks like the contract was a joint venture between Cummins and Achates
Cummins (Achates) OP 4cyl 8piston going into Bradley vehicle within a few weeks for DOD testing.
Fairbanks (Achates) OP 5,000Hp + is in production
Two-Stroke NOISE;)
37mpg, that is okay
 

John C.

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2007
Messages
12,870
Location
Northwest
Occupation
Machinery & Equipment Appraiser
Looks like you have to pull the whole front end off the truck to work on it.
 

DMiller

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 21, 2010
Messages
16,591
Location
Hermann, Missouri
Occupation
Cheap "old" Geezer
Pretty much true on the nothing new, Ford and independents have been removing cabs to work heads on 6.0, 6.4 even the late 7.3 engines as was faster than working under the hood. Late model GMs I have heard are as bad or worse on the Duramax.
 

Junkyard

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 5, 2016
Messages
3,636
Location
Claremore, OK
Occupation
Field Mechanic
Go Greyhound! Haha. Good luck in a drive thru with that! You don’t suppose it really is a 6v-53 with some fancy camouflage......
 

StanRUS

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2016
Messages
767
Location
Cal
Last edited:
Top