Python
Member
Hello everybody,
At first many, many thanks for all your efforts for helping me to determine this excavator and its bucket. Very, very sad to here, that almost every size of bucket could have been on this excavator and that not even the number of the teeth can be used as a hint of the wide of the bucket. As already noted by other users, this picture was in several newspapers and even a biologist recently mentioned the shown reticulated python as probably 11 m long in a scientific paper. I would have loved to disprove this most probably very exaggerated measurement with the help of you – the experts. But I realize now, that it seems almost impossible. Once again, thank you very much for all your help!
At first many, many thanks for all your efforts for helping me to determine this excavator and its bucket. Very, very sad to here, that almost every size of bucket could have been on this excavator and that not even the number of the teeth can be used as a hint of the wide of the bucket. As already noted by other users, this picture was in several newspapers and even a biologist recently mentioned the shown reticulated python as probably 11 m long in a scientific paper. I would have loved to disprove this most probably very exaggerated measurement with the help of you – the experts. But I realize now, that it seems almost impossible. Once again, thank you very much for all your help!