• Thank you for visiting HeavyEquipmentForums.com! Our objective is to provide industry professionals a place to gather to exchange questions, answers and ideas. We welcome you to register using the "Register" icon at the top of the page. We'd appreciate any help you can offer in spreading the word of our new site. The more members that join, the bigger resource for all to enjoy. Thank you!

Cat 977L

DMiller

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 21, 2010
Messages
19,315
Location
Hermann, Missouri
Occupation
Cheap "old" Geezer
As I recall in the late 70s, many of these ended up discarded as broke up on heavy use machines, no one seemed to care as machine lifespans were short on hard contractor use and trade outs. Few of those survived those years here.
 

ChrisUK

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 23, 2020
Messages
168
Location
England
Occupation
Plant operator
Update time !
The two lower engine bay side screens are now bolted in, have started on the top sections too.

Just in a base coat colour for now until we get to painting it one day.

The front bonnet bolts have previously been cut off with a grinder, not sure why. On with drilling them out as didn’t fancy heating the front cowl with the gas as it’s a bit too close to the radiator for my liking.

Cheers Chris.
60EEDBC8-5A6A-472C-B706-F6DC78D95302.jpegE0E239DE-6021-4210-B295-5ABB9231C1B1.jpeg60B6DC13-0D48-459D-8AB0-2E70EF690B55.jpegE0E239DE-6021-4210-B295-5ABB9231C1B1.jpeg98E372BB-77F3-4712-87BD-65379C4011F0.jpeg
 

IceHole

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2023
Messages
1,463
Location
AK
Is that a CAT cab? My 1977 or 78 977L cab looks nothing like that. It's a CAT cab.

Mine looks like this...


I have dozer tracks on mine and forks. Was used for pulling CAT trains and moving materials here in Prudhoe is what I was told.
 

ChrisUK

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 23, 2020
Messages
168
Location
England
Occupation
Plant operator
Is that a CAT cab? My 1977 or 78 977L cab looks nothing like that. It's a CAT cab.

Mine looks like this...


I have dozer tracks on mine and forks. Was used for pulling CAT trains and moving materials here in Prudhoe is what I was told.
It was made by a company called Westlode for Caterpillar, I’ll get a picture of the data tag next week.
It’s the only 977L I’ve seen with this type of cab.
Cheers Chris.
 

Nige

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 22, 2011
Messages
38,754
Location
G..G..G..Granville.........!! Fetch your cloth.
I recall seeing Westlode cabs on UK-built D8K's sold by Leverton back in the day.
Strangely enough I can't remember seeing them on units sold by Bowmaker.

EDIT: I just discovered that Westlode Engineering was a division of H Leverton & Co. That would explain it. On the basis of that I would say that Leverton would be the dealer that orignally sold the 977L that @ChrisUK now owns.

 
Last edited:

ChrisUK

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 23, 2020
Messages
168
Location
England
Occupation
Plant operator
I recall seeing Westlode cabs on UK-built D8K's sold by Leverton back in the day.
Strangely enough I can't remember seeing them on units sold by Bowmaker.

EDIT: I just discovered that Westlode Engineering was a division of H Leverton & Co. That would explain it. On the basis of that I would say that Leverton would be the dealer that orignally sold the 977L that @ChrisUK now owns.

Good find @Nige thanks :cool:
 

Welder Dave

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 11, 2014
Messages
18,169
Location
Canada
I figured they were bent but haven't seen them bent that much before. I wonder if the 4 in 1 bucket might have contributed to the bending?
 

Welder Dave

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 11, 2014
Messages
18,169
Location
Canada
I'm thinking they bent because of operator error. Maybe from tilting the bucket down to use the teeth like a root rake in hard material? Another thought is from tilting the bucket down all the way with the loader arms at a low height and then raising the arms higher or the opposite, tilting the bucket all the way down with the arms high and then lowering the arms/bucket to the ground. The manual for my 931B states to not to do this because it can damage/break the tilt rams. Not sure if the curl links would/could be affected by this. A 977 may have bucket linkage that allows the bucket to be fully dumped and move through the full stroke of the lift cylinders.
 

charles walton

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 24, 2012
Messages
598
Location
Etowah Tennessee
I'm thinking they bent because of operator error. Maybe from tilting the bucket down to use the teeth like a root rake in hard material? Another thought is from tilting the bucket down all the way with the loader arms at a low height and then raising the arms higher or the opposite, tilting the bucket all the way down with the arms high and then lowering the arms/bucket to the ground. The manual for my 931B states to not to do this because it can damage/break the tilt rams. Not sure if the curl links would/could be affected by this. A 977 may have bucket linkage that allows the bucket to be fully dumped and move through the full stroke of the lift cylinders.
I don't think either of those scenarios would bend them, Most likely bent by tying a chain around them and trying to pull something.
 

DMiller

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 21, 2010
Messages
19,315
Location
Hermann, Missouri
Occupation
Cheap "old" Geezer
4/1 or MP as cat denotes is around a full third heavier than a GP materials bucket

Damned thing on my old Allis was near to double, odd machine.
 

AllDodge

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2011
Messages
2,604
Location
Kentucky
I think it was a design flaw, and some either preemptively added angle iron or they were straightened and angle added later. This is my 955, and I didn't add the angle iron
 

Attachments

  • 20250809_151443.jpg
    20250809_151443.jpg
    4.8 MB · Views: 13
Top