JimBruce42
Senior Member
hey all,
I've had a question rolling in my mind lately, and finally just want to ask.
This more or less pertains to excavators with variable undercarriages, which most manufactures have an option for on their 45-130 ton machines. I realize that the frame can be unbolted and shifted out for better balance, or in for a narrower width for transport. Now in the larger machines, most times, the tracks just come off, as opposed to pulled in because even narrow it's typically still too wide.
For simplicity sake, I'll pick the 85 ton machines, since it's in the middle. I know that every state (and sometimes route) has a weight and or size law that may determine how much comes off the machine to fit those laws, but since they have a variable undercarriage, is it cheaper/easier to push the tracks in, or to just remove them all together and transport them seperately?:beatsme
I hope that all makes sense.
I've had a question rolling in my mind lately, and finally just want to ask.
This more or less pertains to excavators with variable undercarriages, which most manufactures have an option for on their 45-130 ton machines. I realize that the frame can be unbolted and shifted out for better balance, or in for a narrower width for transport. Now in the larger machines, most times, the tracks just come off, as opposed to pulled in because even narrow it's typically still too wide.
For simplicity sake, I'll pick the 85 ton machines, since it's in the middle. I know that every state (and sometimes route) has a weight and or size law that may determine how much comes off the machine to fit those laws, but since they have a variable undercarriage, is it cheaper/easier to push the tracks in, or to just remove them all together and transport them seperately?:beatsme
I hope that all makes sense.