• Thank you for visiting HeavyEquipmentForums.com! Our objective is to provide industry professionals a place to gather to exchange questions, answers and ideas. We welcome you to register using the "Register" icon at the top of the page. We'd appreciate any help you can offer in spreading the word of our new site. The more members that join, the bigger resource for all to enjoy. Thank you!

Ed's 77 Terex 72-41

kshansen

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2012
Messages
11,165
Location
Central New York, USA
Occupation
Retired Mechanic in Stone Quarry
Guess if you have a good Detroit mechanic to help you might be best to see what he says. Would not want to tick him off for you by you saying "some guy on the internet said"

But one is the limiting speed governor and the other is a variable speed governor. I did work on many engines using one or the other but never tried replacing one type governor with the other in an application.

I know from memory an engine that needs to run at a set RPM needs the variable speed governor, I know it does sound a little counterintuitive! If I get bored tomorrow maybe I'll do some digging on the reasons for the two.
 

Birken Vogt

Charter Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2003
Messages
5,324
Location
Grass Valley, Ca
Variable speed means that whatever you set the lever at is going to mean one RPM that the governor will try to maintain.

Limiting speed means that the lever (more or less) directly controls the fuel rack and the limits are there to keep it at idle speed or prevent it from overspeeding.

I am kind of surprised that something like a loader had an LS governor, and if it was mine, I would be tempted to just run it with the VS governor if the rest of the red engine configuration is acceptable for the loader. I did not follow the discussion completely so I don't know if RPM range, horsepower setting, etc. is correct or not.
 

kshansen

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2012
Messages
11,165
Location
Central New York, USA
Occupation
Retired Mechanic in Stone Quarry
I would be tempted to just run it with the VS governor if the rest of the red engine configuration is acceptable for the loader. I did not follow the discussion completely so I don't know if RPM range, horsepower setting, etc. is correct or not.

Agree, if for my own use and I was able to keep the governor off the original engine I would give the red engine a try as built. If for nothing else to see how it worked.

However if doing this for a "customer" I might lean towards using the governor set-up that was original to the loader. This is just because some people can get all kinds of upset if something works even a little different than they expect!
 

56wrench

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 4, 2016
Messages
2,123
Location
alberta
Well, think of it this way. Limiting speed means your size 9 shoe controls the maximum speed of the engine(within the preset parameters) like in a truck or loader. A variable speed means a throttle lever controls the speed and can be set to maintain it at a constant speed required, like in a tractor, excavator, pump, etc. that may need to run at a constant speed under variable load.
 

kshansen

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2012
Messages
11,165
Location
Central New York, USA
Occupation
Retired Mechanic in Stone Quarry
Well, think of it this way. Limiting speed means your size 9 shoe controls the maximum speed of the engine(within the preset parameters) like in a truck or loader. A variable speed means a throttle lever controls the speed and can be set to maintain it at a constant speed required, like in a tractor, excavator, pump, etc. that may need to run at a constant speed under variable load.
Yes I understand that, just wonder how the variable speed would effect the way a loader preformed. I seem to recall some loaders having a hand throttle that could be used to set the minimum engine speed. I think that was suppose to help with production as the engine would not need the second or two to get up to speed after letting off the throttle. And yes I know that that foot peddle is a governor control and NOT an actual throttle!
 

56wrench

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 4, 2016
Messages
2,123
Location
alberta
It will probably work but the throttle response MAY be slower and the throttle linkage may have to be changed. DDA made so many combinations it can get confusing. The worst one i encountered had a variable low speed/limiting high speed governor with a booster spring on a fabricated bracket on the top cover. It powered an auger truck for a power company, hence the need for a variable low speed function while running the auger. It was a complicated governor to get set right
 

Birken Vogt

Charter Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2003
Messages
5,324
Location
Grass Valley, Ca
The thing about a straight LS governor was that foot position = rack position and that is not always a good thing. It is fine for driving around on the street because it is like a carburetor, more pedal = more fuel. But I remember on a fire truck if you tried to set the hand throttle to maintain say 1200 RPM because you did not want the thing low idling for hours, it was not really possible. It would either creep up to governed speed or slowly decay to idle.

Now if there was drag on it such as the fire pump, not a problem any more. But VS governors were also used on truck engines, and those that had it felt much nicer to me, I am a slow and steady sort of driver. LS makes it feel more like a race car.

It will probably work but the throttle response MAY be slower and the throttle linkage may have to be changed. DDA made so many combinations it can get confusing. The worst one i encountered had a variable low speed/limiting high speed governor with a booster spring on a fabricated bracket on the top cover. It powered an auger truck for a power company, hence the need for a variable low speed function while running the auger. It was a complicated governor to get set right
 

mountainguyed67

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 4, 2017
Messages
594
Location
Fresno, California, USA
Switched these parts, the filler can’t be where it is on the red engine. That part of the engine isn’t accessible.

They’re not exactly the same behind the parts, I left them how they are.
1DCC9DFC-7D04-474B-9E06-1595F8DE4CC7.jpeg D7E32482-DB7B-40B6-8E35-990C56A8ED26.jpeg E6A1AD5C-6EBC-476B-AF1B-723AB24F7CC7.jpeg

The green engine had a breather on top of the rocker cover. There’s another place for this, but that’ll be blocked by the starter.
22ABAE71-5EAE-4348-B56C-6462A482C221.jpeg
 

mountainguyed67

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 4, 2017
Messages
594
Location
Fresno, California, USA
Guess if you have a good Detroit mechanic to help you might be best to see what he says.

He couldn’t make it last Thursday after all, said he was back in the hospital with a recurring illness. We were supposed to swap the engine that day, it didn’t happen because the guy with the forklift got squeamish. I took it apart where I did because he stood right there telling me he could do it, then when the time came he called the situation a “can of ****”. There’s no perfectly level ground, but I put it where he could come uphill on a slight incline, but be level side to side. He brought a 4,000 lb 2WD forklift, he was supposed to bring his 8,000 lb 4WD forklift. So he tells me if I get the bigger one up there it’ll handle it no problem, a few hours later he says no to that as well. I need to separate myself from this guy. The others I’ve ran it by say the 8,000 lb 4WD is overkill. So I’ll talk to the next guy that offered to do it, he ran forestry equipment for a living and has a machine he says will do it. Around here running forestry equipment means “on hills”.
 

mountainguyed67

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 4, 2017
Messages
594
Location
Fresno, California, USA
Maybe two more days and it’ll be ready to go back in.

68DAB155-91E4-4D50-90DD-8D0BBAF71802.jpeg

Broken engine mount, already welded back together. It warped though, will try and press it straight.
FBE3E290-E47D-4B65-8524-12FAB56918F4.jpeg

The balance weight cover didn’t have a fan mount, front mount and pulley were different. Bell housing is also different, that’s for next time. Oil pump is different too, the loader had a double pickup, water pump had one.
880B66B1-F618-41AF-AD91-6652E9F2D893.jpeg

Used a tripod and chain hoist for lifting.
BE5CB294-AC57-4F71-B7C0-5AB476BABB5F.jpeg
 

kshansen

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2012
Messages
11,165
Location
Central New York, USA
Occupation
Retired Mechanic in Stone Quarry
I'm guessing the original engine is made to work on slopes which explains the 2 pick up oil pump system.
Or just moving around while running, where a genset or water pump usually sits nice and steady and level while running so the need for the scavenger section of the oil pump is not needed.
 
Top