JNB
Senior Member
So, I was thinking about what I would change if I were designing a CTL to be more operator friendly. I honed my skills on track loaders and skip loaders (industrial tractors.) Both of these allow for a really good view of whats going on around the operator. In response to operator input, track loader engines were moved rearward and operator platforms for both track loaders and skip loaders were raised. Both of these changes were major improvements.
I understand the dual platform (SS/CTL) capability of the design from a "bottom line" manufacturers viewpoint, but why the "stuck in a rut" mentality when it comes to improvements? The only improvement I've seen is "cab forward", which is a debatable improvement anyway. (I won't include JCB's one arm bandit in the discussion mainly because IMO it's a stupid gimmic design.) All of the designs out there today stick the operator down in what is essentially a daylight basement. The only decent view of what's going on is out of a narrow front door. Loader towers and the engine cover block the rear view, loader arms block the side views. Unless the door is a flip-up version, the operator is stuck in the cab if the loader arms are just a little off the ground. It doesn't make any sense to me.
Imagine raising the operators station up just 12" on your CTL. (Takeuchi's roof is almost there anyway.) There would be a much better from grading to backing up to loading trucks...not to mention that better vision equals a higher degree of safety for anyone in the work area. The operator would be further away from all the mechanicals that make noise and heat. There would be more room for the mechanicals as well. Today's designs pack so much crap in such a small space that access to mechanicals has gotten ridiculous.
So what do you think?
I understand the dual platform (SS/CTL) capability of the design from a "bottom line" manufacturers viewpoint, but why the "stuck in a rut" mentality when it comes to improvements? The only improvement I've seen is "cab forward", which is a debatable improvement anyway. (I won't include JCB's one arm bandit in the discussion mainly because IMO it's a stupid gimmic design.) All of the designs out there today stick the operator down in what is essentially a daylight basement. The only decent view of what's going on is out of a narrow front door. Loader towers and the engine cover block the rear view, loader arms block the side views. Unless the door is a flip-up version, the operator is stuck in the cab if the loader arms are just a little off the ground. It doesn't make any sense to me.
Imagine raising the operators station up just 12" on your CTL. (Takeuchi's roof is almost there anyway.) There would be a much better from grading to backing up to loading trucks...not to mention that better vision equals a higher degree of safety for anyone in the work area. The operator would be further away from all the mechanicals that make noise and heat. There would be more room for the mechanicals as well. Today's designs pack so much crap in such a small space that access to mechanicals has gotten ridiculous.
So what do you think?