• Thank you for visiting HeavyEquipmentForums.com! Our objective is to provide industry professionals a place to gather to exchange questions, answers and ideas. We welcome you to register using the "Register" icon at the top of the page. We'd appreciate any help you can offer in spreading the word of our new site. The more members that join, the bigger resource for all to enjoy. Thank you!

FAE/Loftness mulching head

jamesn

Active Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2009
Messages
29
Location
texas
Occupation
forestry mulching
The tushogg tries the same approach, chew it up and mix it into the ground, the guys that ran it claimed they tried not to run it into the dirt because it was hard on teeth and they wanted the mulch left on the ground for erosion control, just when they wanted to chew up stumps would they dig into the dirt but then added when it rained it washed off the dirt and left the stump exposed anyhow, if it was a big stump they came in with a stump grinder anyhow, and as the one guy put it if we liked it why would we be selling it? They claimed they have owned them all over the years and were'nt impressed with any of them except the disc style but they we're only good up to two inch material and thats it. They were not impressed with ironwolf at all but wouldln't say much about them othe than they were the highest price of the junk on the market and thats all I got out of them. They were pushing instead a whole tree chipper and put a small feller buncher on a skid steer and cut the trees up to about 12 inches and feed them into a chipper put a stump grinder attachment on the skidsteer and grind stumps and if they wanted erosion control then spread the chips back out. Somewhere that just got real expensive I told them but then they came back with you also have all the attachments to do a variety of jobs and do them well instead of one attachment that doesn't do anythng very well, I guess they do have a point but still thats now 100 grand plus instead of 30 grand or less. They also stated these attachments were ment for 5inch or less material and were never intended for bigger trees and when they upsized them in order to get them to eat them they had to mix them into the dirt to hide the poor quality cut they make, they had no idea who would buy one of the bigger units and for what purpose, pipelines, powercompanies, developers, state and local agencies, business's and homeowners don't like the end result so as they put it whos left? Their opinion was don't buy any mulching attachment that can dig into the dirt period. Your supposed to be eliminating the brush and small trees not tilling the entire site with a garden tiller, the comsumer wants the grass to remain intact as much as possible and hold the dirt from wahing not dig it up and leave it to wash.

tush hog is not worth a s#@t, buy a fecon
 

jamesn

Active Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2009
Messages
29
Location
texas
Occupation
forestry mulching
the loftness products are definitely the best of the "cheap" machines ;)

loftness is ok, buy a fecon you will be much happier. i have used both and the fecon does a much better job chewing up wood. thefecon is constructed alot better also
 

HeyUvaVT

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
337
Location
Virginia
James...I am curious did you run a CIMAF head or did you run a Gyro Trac head...there is a big difference in both cost and quality of the blades...I see that you are a big Fecon fan...and if you are looking for a tree grinder then thats fine...but as far as a mulcher goes with good cut quality and efficiency and speed through the woods (isnt that what we are all after?) the CIMAF heads can't be touched...a box of 22 blades is $1075 not too far from a set of carbide hammers (if you buy them from the OEM and not some 3rd party junk with a gorilla for a logo)

I have a front mount CIMAF head and a Excavator mount CIMAF head (the smallest they make by the way) and I will challenge anyone anywhere anytime to put they're machines up against what I am running...Go get a Bullfrog/hog or whatever they call them and put whatever kind of teeth you want to on them (maybe the chipper teeth that they felt the need to develope?) mount it on a 100hp tracked machine (to match with the beat up RC100 mine is on) and lets run em! I will cut faster, leave less mess behind (stringy long and unsightly pieces of wood) oh and also those little sprigs and pieces that stick up out of the ground when you try and hammer to death a little sapling....none of those either ugh!

I am not trying to sound like an arrogant SOB..which I may well be...but I am tired of hearing Fecon this and Fecon that...I too have run multiple brands and multiple carriers day in and day out and I am telling you that if you run the machine the way its made to be run you can't beat it...period and I will back it up....


Good day!
 

jamesn

Active Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2009
Messages
29
Location
texas
Occupation
forestry mulching
James...I am curious did you run a CIMAF head or did you run a Gyro Trac head...there is a big difference in both cost and quality of the blades...I see that you are a big Fecon fan...and if you are looking for a tree grinder then thats fine...but as far as a mulcher goes with good cut quality and efficiency and speed through the woods (isnt that what we are all after?) the CIMAF heads can't be touched...a box of 22 blades is $1075 not too far from a set of carbide hammers (if you buy them from the OEM and not some 3rd party junk with a gorilla for a logo)

I have a front mount CIMAF head and a Excavator mount CIMAF head (the smallest they make by the way) and I will challenge anyone anywhere anytime to put they're machines up against what I am running...Go get a Bullfrog/hog or whatever they call them and put whatever kind of teeth you want to on them (maybe the chipper teeth that they felt the need to develope?) mount it on a 100hp tracked machine (to match with the beat up RC100 mine is on) and lets run em! I will cut faster, leave less mess behind (stringy long and unsightly pieces of wood) oh and also those little sprigs and pieces that stick up out of the ground when you try and hammer to death a little sapling....none of those either ugh!

I am not trying to sound like an arrogant SOB..which I may well be...but I am tired of hearing Fecon this and Fecon that...I too have run multiple brands and multiple carriers day in and day out and I am telling you that if you run the machine the way its made to be run you can't beat it...period and I will back it up....


Good day!

i am not putting cimaf down, i have used cimaf on a hydro-ax 411 with a 5.9 cummins 305hp, i have used a fecon on a barko930 cummins 5.9 305hp, the difference to me is the cost of replacing teeth, i have gotten olmost 1000 hours from fecon compared to 40 to 150 hours with cimaf teeth. cimaf is a good head, but i prefer fecon
 

deniscimafinc

Member
Joined
Apr 22, 2008
Messages
9
Location
Roxton Falls, QC
Hello James,

Your comment again shows why it's important to use the right tool at the right place. For ground-level-and-above mulching operations, the forged-steel cutting blades technology will outcut any carbide-hammer machine. For one-pass tiling-and-mulching work, you'll probably get better cost of operation with a carbide-hammer machine. Both types of job are different and require a different tool. I understand you prefer Fecon if you have to mix stuff in the ground; that's not what our heads are made for.

On a more personal note, good luck with the job search. It's been tough for everyone in the past months, tougher for some of course, but we can feel things are getting better. Just hang on, good times are coming. :)


FD
Frederic Denis
DENIS CIMAF Inc.
www.deniscimaf.com
 

jamesn

Active Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2009
Messages
29
Location
texas
Occupation
forestry mulching
frederic dennis, your response is well appreciated, i have done alot of seismac work in texas, and the cimaf head that i used was for clean up purposes after the marker tractor, the head was great to use as for in the hill country where there is alot of rock, the fecon was better. so sandy soil i would use a cimaf, it chewed up the wood really great. the boys at rowmec told me to tell you hi jamesn
 

miner

New Member
Joined
Oct 20, 2009
Messages
3
Location
Canterbury,New Zealand
Occupation
Operator
Hi shredder, I am looking at buying a mulcher and wondere if i could ring you and have a yarn, from NZ as well. Red and Black country. Cheers Miner
 

jamesn

Active Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2009
Messages
29
Location
texas
Occupation
forestry mulching
any work in the forestry business? i am an operator in the forest. not a dirt man, please contact me @281-659-9062, i will relocate as for lost my wife in 12-09 to a dd
 

bill5362

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 29, 2007
Messages
353
Location
Indiana
Occupation
I own a excavation company and a rolloff container
Jamesn, I do not have any work right now but I will keep my ears open. I am truly sorry for your lost is such a shame that people can be so reckless with others lives. Good luck in your search, and I will do some checking, its really slow here with winter. Bill
 

HeyUvaVT

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
337
Location
Virginia
jamesn I also would like to extend my condolences and if I hear of anyone looking for operators I will let you know
 

AustinPSD

Active Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2009
Messages
27
Location
Kerrville, TX
Hello James,

Your comment again shows why it's important to use the right tool at the right place. For ground-level-and-above mulching operations, the forged-steel cutting blades technology will outcut any carbide-hammer machine. For one-pass tiling-and-mulching work, you'll probably get better cost of operation with a carbide-hammer machine. Both types of job are different and require a different tool. I understand you prefer Fecon if you have to mix stuff in the ground; that's not what our heads are made for.

On a more personal note, good luck with the job search. It's been tough for everyone in the past months, tougher for some of course, but we can feel things are getting better. Just hang on, good times are coming. :)


FD
Frederic Denis
DENIS CIMAF Inc.
www.deniscimaf.com

I've been doing dozer support work on a clearing project, working in tandem with a guy running a Lamtrac 6125 with a Fecon head.

The work area is a mix of river basin sediment, loose rock, solid hard rock cap, clay and soil, topped with bald cypress, cedar elm, oak, willow, china berry, and cottonwood, along with a mix of other crap like mesquite and salt cedar.

Most of the rock is hard limestone, either in loose form from gravel size up to boulders in the half ton and larger range. The solid parts include limestone and granite cap, pretty typical for Texas in the Guadalupe river basin.

The Fecon head makes short work of most of the material, and seems to be pretty resistant to rock. The machine has lost one tooth-mount in a week on one of the elements in the cutting head, which is a surprise given the amount of rock it contacts.

It seems to do a fine job of getting the material shredded/mulched, with a few exceptions - there is a lot of material that is either partially burned/petrified, or that was submerged and mineralized. The Fecon head doesn't do too much against this stuff.

Overall, the machine does better on standing trees than anything else. We can't legally take down living cypress, but it does well on large dead cypress, china berry, willow and cottonwood. The Lamtrack has a pretty short track base, seems shorter anyway than the D3G I'm running - it does well on level terrain, not so much on berms and swales or other uneven terrain washes from river floods.

All in, its been a pleasure working with/watching the machine do its thing. A whole lot less tedious than grinding it up by spinning a dozer on it, and more efficient in time, fuel and machine wear.

The operator says its his favorite to run, comparing to a Barko 930, which is the other machine in his stable. It seems like a pretty nimble, but capable forestry mulcher...
 

GaryHoff

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2009
Messages
810
Location
Alberta, Canada
Occupation
Heavey Equipment Mechanic
I've been doing dozer support work on a clearing project, working in tandem with a guy running a Lamtrac 6125 with a Fecon head.

The operator says its his favorite to run, comparing to a Barko 930, which is the other machine in his stable. It seems like a pretty nimble, but capable forestry mulcher...

http://www.lamtrac.com/home/index_e.php

The lamtracs generally come with a FAE head on them. Did you specifically chose the Fecon head over FAE for the area its working in? Have you ran the unit with both brands of head? How many hours are on your lamtrac?

My opinion is probbaly a little biased because I work at a lamtrac dealership.

The Lamtrac machines are generally liked better, due to the better cab on them. They are however high maintenance (much like any mulcher), but seem to be one of the better mulchers on the market.
 

AustinPSD

Active Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2009
Messages
27
Location
Kerrville, TX
http://www.lamtrac.com/home/index_e.php

The lamtracs generally come with a FAE head on them. Did you specifically chose the Fecon head over FAE for the area its working in? Have you ran the unit with both brands of head? How many hours are on your lamtrac?

My opinion is probbaly a little biased because I work at a lamtrac dealership.

The Lamtrac machines are generally liked better, due to the better cab on them. They are however high maintenance (much like any mulcher), but seem to be one of the better mulchers on the market.

It's not my machine, and I'm not the operator... just doing support work during his part of this project. I don't know what his decision-making criteria were for the Fecon vs. FAE head.

The operator does love the cab - air-ride, A/C, excellent guarding/cage, floating, and pretty much every creature comfort. I have to admit I'm jealous - my D3G is an open-cab, no sweeps, no forestry cab...

The area we were working is incredibly rough - I did a lot of leveling, clearing of large boulders/rock, pushing into level patches, clearing of stuff he didn't want to abuse his machine with (semi-burned logs, stumps, mineralized/petrified stuff, other debris). In watching the machine, it worked like a lawn-mower on level ground, even with big (2+ foot) diameter trees. On the berms, swales, and river drift piles, it was problematic.

The Fecon head may be a local support/terrain decision. Central Texas is about two inches to two feet of soil, or soil-like material over solid cap rock or mixed/broken rock. It changes about every two linear feet. Whatever you put on the ground has to be capable of surviving an encounter with a variety of rock, from river gravel/stone to solid limestone or granite cap rock.

If I have the chance to work with him on the next project phase, I'll see if I can get more background on the FAE vs. Fecon and other decisions.
 

roper ron

New Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2011
Messages
1
Location
Wyoming
Lamtrac and heads

I would like to finally come out and tell people about the treatment I received from Lamtrac and Tidewater Equipment in NewBrunswick. I bought a new(under 50 hour demo) Lamtrac 6125 and mulcher head. The head looked beat and I looked into it and the belt was loose and worn along with worn teeth. The style head wasn't even made for Lamtrac anymore. The serial number wasn't there and they posted a wrong serial number. Lamtrac and Tidewater in NewBrunswick denied the head was over 50 hours. I proved it by tracing the Rexroth hydraulic motor serial number and found out the head was around three years older than represented. This investigation took a long time. The F.B.I. said they would handle it but that was over a year ago. Lamtrac and Tidewater stopped honoring my warranty and taking my calls or answering my emails. I still have the email where Lamtrac said they would make it right after I proved how old the head was. I had to buy a NEW head to be safe with a model made special for Lamtrac and it couldn't handle the gpm or psi, which is very dangerous. The handbook said DO NOT EXCEED 4,000 psi BUT the machine puts out 6,000 psi. Nowhere does the Lamtrac Company tell you how to lower the machine preasure to the head. Why pay for all that fluid to the head and have to choke it down somehow? I also bought a high lift kit from lamtrac and the mulcher head manual said the head shouldn't be lifted past the chains touching the ground or SERIOUS INJURY OR DEATH MAY OCCUR. The lift kit raises the chains over five feet off the ground. I'm out a ton of money with a hard machine to keep working with no Lamtrac support or Tidewater (dealer)support. I have the emails to prove all this and I'm hoping maybe these ripoffs will get back to me now that it's in the open. I don't want people hurt, a mulcher head needs to handle the 6,000 psi and the 60 gpm. Both mulcher heads were supposed to bypass at 4,000 psi but neither did so you can't count on that, the manual simply says don't exceed 4,000 p.s.i.Tidewater said I had to pay the shipping to send the unit I bought from Colorado to Georgia and the replacement head which was an even older Fecon with unknown hours and pay for the freight from Georgia to Colorado. They called this "bending over Backwards to help me" I guess that's all you can expect when buying a quarter of a million dollar machine these days, I am not a rich man and this really hurts. I spent so much time proving I was right on the head being old, then ordering a new head, getting all the information to the F.B.I in NewBrunswick and even he doesn't return my calls after pumping me up with all the things they did wrong, then dealing with too much preasure to the new head, which cost another $30,000. This whole fiasco may break me with two kids and a ranch mortgage.
 

Karl P R

New Member
Joined
Mar 26, 2013
Messages
1
Location
Canada
Looking for a Mulching Head

Looking for a head to mulch frozen or none frozen soil with possibly rocks among it. thinking of the FAE Rock head I am in Canada and need to strip top soil from farmed land. I want to use a bigger tractor for faster operation in tuff conditions. The tractor I am looking to use on the head is a JD 8R series which comes with around 300hp motor. Now asking you for directions where I could find a head used but in very good shape. What are the prices I can expect?


Hi Everyone,

I am from New Zealand and would like to share my thoughts on experiences I have had with various machines.

SEPPI- Good swinging flail mowers up to 3 inch in diameter

BERTI- As above

MAGNUM/ BRADCO- Good robust machines however this reverse interchangable hammer is not. You will find you will take the hammer down to a certain level and interchange the hammer. Thinking there is alot of meat left however in most cases you will find it will break once reversed.

FAE- Good robust machines however I havent had any luck with service and warranty claims. There used to be an agent here in NZ that made back up easy however I think that the FAE factory owns Australasia. I have tried many times to stake a warranty and nobody wants to know.

DENNIS CLIMAF- Excellent machines however I feel they are a little too heavy and only good in clear tree mulching and not contamination

FMI- New brand of smooth drum mulcher from Fecon. Excellent robust design with FAE style hammers. I have a good run out of these with really good back up here in NZ. However they do need to touch up on their touching finishes (only cosmetically)

FECON- We have also tried this brand and have had a good run out of them. However I am not that happy with an open styled drum. This slows down the drum and puts more pressure on the motor.

CATERPILLAR- IS AHWI which is made by fecon and ahwi.

ASV Mulcher- Is made by Fecon

If anybody requires any cheap FAE, FMI, BERTI, SEPPI hammers/ flails I can get my hands on some really good cheap ones in NZ dollars too.

As with the mulchers here in NZ or Australia I can lead you in the right direction for mulching equipment new or used.


I look forward to anyones answers or questions
 

Plebeian

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2009
Messages
434
Location
NZ
Looking for a head to mulch frozen or none frozen soil with possibly rocks among it. thinking of the FAE Rock head I am in Canada and need to strip top soil from farmed land. I want to use a bigger tractor for faster operation in tuff conditions. The tractor I am looking to use on the head is a JD 8R series which comes with around 300hp motor. Now asking you for directions where I could find a head used but in very good shape. What are the prices I can expect?

A preused machine is likely to have little or no warranty with it so that is part of the risk you take purchasing pre-used.

http://www.tractorhouse.com/list/list.aspx?ETID=1&Manu=FAE (Attachment World, Alberta) Maybe not the right machine for you. The stone crushers I have seen have had Fendt tractors in front of them. I guess you can find the FAE website for stone crusher specifications.
AHWI and Seppi-M also make some large tractor powered stone crushers that are very serious.
http://www.ahwi.com.au/pages/stonecrusher.htm

http://youtu.be/XDEQfZRAVxc (Seppi)

http://seppi.com/en/mulchers/stone-crushers-tillers.html
 

kiwiclimber

Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2013
Messages
10
Location
new zealand
Occupation
arborist/earthmoving
Hi,Sorry to revive a old thread but does any one have any contact details for shredder
Thanks Mark


Hi Everyone,

I am from New Zealand and would like to share my thoughts on experiences I have had with various machines.

SEPPI- Good swinging flail mowers up to 3 inch in diameter

BERTI- As above

MAGNUM/ BRADCO- Good robust machines however this reverse interchangable hammer is not. You will find you will take the hammer down to a certain level and interchange the hammer. Thinking there is alot of meat left however in most cases you will find it will break once reversed.

FAE- Good robust machines however I havent had any luck with service and warranty claims. There used to be an agent here in NZ that made back up easy however I think that the FAE factory owns Australasia. I have tried many times to stake a warranty and nobody wants to know.

DENNIS CLIMAF- Excellent machines however I feel they are a little too heavy and only good in clear tree mulching and not contamination

FMI- New brand of smooth drum mulcher from Fecon. Excellent robust design with FAE style hammers. I have a good run out of these with really good back up here in NZ. However they do need to touch up on their touching finishes (only cosmetically)

FECON- We have also tried this brand and have had a good run out of them. However I am not that happy with an open styled drum. This slows down the drum and puts more pressure on the motor.

CATERPILLAR- IS AHWI which is made by fecon and ahwi.

ASV Mulcher- Is made by Fecon

If anybody requires any cheap FAE, FMI, BERTI, SEPPI hammers/ flails I can get my hands on some really good cheap ones in NZ dollars too.

As with the mulchers here in NZ or Australia I can lead you in the right direction for mulching equipment new or used.


I look forward to anyones answers or questions
 
Top