• Thank you for visiting HeavyEquipmentForums.com! Our objective is to provide industry professionals a place to gather to exchange questions, answers and ideas. We welcome you to register using the "Register" icon at the top of the page. We'd appreciate any help you can offer in spreading the word of our new site. The more members that join, the bigger resource for all to enjoy. Thank you!

Loegering's new track system

Bob Horrell

Charter Member
Joined
Nov 18, 2003
Messages
424
Location
Acton, CA
Occupation
Owner/Operator grading business
For over a year now I have been toying with the idea of getting a track loader to replace my Bobcat S250. I do a lot of work on hills and in some areas where I work there are pretty sandy conditions. I have grouser tracks I have used on the hilly areas and they work great there but aren't that good in sand.
I have tried the ASV 80, ASV 100, CAT 287, and Bobcat T300 machines. The Bobcat has superior break out forces which is important to me in the land clearing portion of my business. I liked the CAT machine better but it was lacking in hydraulic power.
After trying all these machines I decided I would stick to my S250 and change to over the tire tracks that are designed to work better in sandy conditions. Then I found out about the Loegering ATS track system that is a complete suspended rubber track system that bolts on in place of the wheels and tires on a skid steer. It is relatively new (been under test for the last 2 years on numerous brands of skid steers). It is driven by the rear hubs only and the front hub is a suspended idler. They weigh about 1600lbs per side (all the weight is right down low to the ground) so machine stability is greatly improved. The factory says they have a Bobcat 863 with over 2,000 hrs. on these tracks with no problems. They also claim they work well with 2 speed systems which I have.
I am wondering if anyone on this site knows anyone who has used this system or has seen one on a job site. The factory said they would get me some names of people with experience with them I could talk to. I am interested because for a small business guy like me I can have the best of both worlds with just one machine (a regular wheeled skid steer and a track loader). They claim it takes less than an hour to change over between tires and tracks. They are pricey at around $15 to $16K but still a lot better than having two machines.
I would sure appreciate any input anyone might have.
Thanks
 

deldirt

New Member
Joined
Nov 8, 2004
Messages
1
The following may be helpful :

Cat bought 15% of ASV to aquire the track system. Cat skids now employ the asv system.

ASV recently bought Loergering. So this should be an advantage to any track system development.

I have read about the replacement system but have not seen it in action.

The ASV people were previous Polaris snowmobile employees. So, they should know trac drives.

I have a Case 1835 and an ASV 50. The 1835 seldom gets used.
I would not trade my 50 for 2 wheeled skids.
 

P7M8

Member
Joined
Oct 31, 2004
Messages
14
Location
Maryland
A friend of mine had to put his LS180 in the shop and the dealer gave him an LS180 with the track system installed as a loaner. I'll ask him what he thinks or try it out myself. The dealer told my friend it would take two hours to change it over. It looked like a real pain to install. They looked well built and it made the machine look tough. 15K is kinda steep though.
 

Bob Horrell

Charter Member
Joined
Nov 18, 2003
Messages
424
Location
Acton, CA
Occupation
Owner/Operator grading business
I talked to a guy in Ohio who is using one on a Bobcat S300 and they like it a lot better than the dedicated track loader they have in their fleet. He said all his guys fight over who gets to use it.
I found out they have a block system that you can use when doing fine grading so the suspension doesn't interfere with a finish grade.
I have been thinking about the the install process and have purchased 4 car dollies (the ones that fit under the tires of a car so you can roll it around in a shop) and plan to use two per side and then block up the Bobcat to a height that allows me to just roll them up and bolt them on. I talked to a factory rep that has been going around to dealers and helping them with the first installations. He reports that he has done one in a little more than a half hour (with an assistant) using a hoist. With a forklift he says it is a little less than an hour. He also said that the factory is working on a install kit that is about the same as my idea with the dollies.
Let me know what you and your friend think of them.
 

P7M8

Member
Joined
Oct 31, 2004
Messages
14
Location
Maryland
I talked to my friend after he got to use the tracks a bit. He said they were smooth and didn't tear up the ground very much. Overall, he liked them. The LS180 was underpowered with them though. Apparently the tracks eat up a lot of power. He said the machine with the tracks is slow. I didn't get a chance to try them.
 

Cat420

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 11, 2004
Messages
527
Location
Pine Bush Ny
Occupation
Construction, small engine and machine shop work
Originally posted by P7M8
I talked to my friend after he got to use the tracks a bit. He said they were smooth and didn't tear up the ground very much. Overall, he liked them. The LS180 was underpowered with them though. Apparently the tracks eat up a lot of power. He said the machine with the tracks is slow. I didn't get a chance to try them.

I guess the tracks over the tires would increase the overall diameter of the tire and equal a higher gearing at the wheels. It seems like this make little difference, unless the LS180 is underpowered to start with. Maybe I'm misunderstanding what you mean by "slow".
 

Bob Horrell

Charter Member
Joined
Nov 18, 2003
Messages
424
Location
Acton, CA
Occupation
Owner/Operator grading business
I have used grouser over the tire tracks on my S250. They weigh about 1,000lbs and provide much more traction. I still had plenty of power and could spin them at two thirds throttle. I am assuming I will be OK power wise with the ATS system. It is pretty heavy at about 1,500lbs per side and with much better traction it is bound to rob some power. The guy with the S300 using them said it wasn't an issue.
I have driven the T300 and it had plenty of power and it would be very comparable to what I would have.
 

P7M8

Member
Joined
Oct 31, 2004
Messages
14
Location
Maryland
Originally posted by Cat420
I guess the tracks over the tires would increase the overall diameter of the tire and equal a higher gearing at the wheels. It seems like this make little difference, unless the LS180 is underpowered to start with. Maybe I'm misunderstanding what you mean by "slow".

These are not over the tire tracks. They replace the wheels. He thinks the LS180 is a bit underpowered to begin with. He actually prefers his old LX665. He says it doesn't bog down as much. As far as track machines, he insists Takeuchi is the best. I haven't seen anyone here mention them though.
 

Bob Horrell

Charter Member
Joined
Nov 18, 2003
Messages
424
Location
Acton, CA
Occupation
Owner/Operator grading business
When I was testing track loaders, I tried ASV, Bobcat, and CAT machines. I never tried the Takeuchi track machine. I have also heard from others that they are very good. They have been making them a long time, but you just don't see that many of them. For that matter, you don't see that many of any of the track machines here on the west coast.
 

illinoisboy

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2009
Messages
146
Location
Greenup
Occupation
contractor
A friend of mine has a Tak TL26. He loves it. I actually just ran it last week a few days. it has very good power, and gets around great. We changed the tracks on it last week, as the old ones were like racing slicks, and it took about an hour to swap. I have an HMI 2650, and am thinking of getting some tracks for it as well. I like the Loegering steel tracks, but the weight is an issue. I want to keep it where I can pull it on my 14 k trailer, and it already weighs 11000. If the new system you were talking about wasnt 15 grand i would be all over it! I mean really, you can buy a decent tracked loader for 15 grand.
 

LanceNE

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 7, 2009
Messages
101
Location
Utah
Occupation
Land clearing/Fuels reduction
Ran a new VTS system on a Cat 262C for 2 months. Ran it alongside the MTL system and the same horsepower in a 287C. Here is what I've seen, at least on a Cat perspective, at least on the VTS. On the 262C, the system is under horsepower and doing the same work you use considerably more fuel. It also heated the hydraulics up more. A contractor doing the same type of work we are doing, bought a 272C with the VTS system and had them tore up pretty bad in a couple of months. Things I liked about them....gave you more clearance, definitely stayed on better than the CTL, and had that little tank feel to them. Things I didn't like....added fuel consumption and hydraulic heating. Some of the attachments were harder to hook up due to the higher stance. I think it would be workable in many applications but I would make sure there is enough horsepower so you don't have the heating and fuel issues. On a side note, from this forum and others I keep hearing about how the Takeuchi are built like a tank, was at a dealer that sells both Takeuchi and CASE and they too talked the Taks up. They are definitely one if I had the opportunity I would look at.
 
Top