I always though I needed one but I certainly do notThanks for sharing that, I just checked it out, another sexy big machine.
I always though I needed one but I certainly do notThanks for sharing that, I just checked it out, another sexy big machine.
This moreless sums up why you see the big backhoes on road jobs hard surfaces to drive on a payloads to load trucks and could hang a sizeable hammer of the backIf you are operating in soft sandy soil you probably will find that tractor a hindrance to operate with a full bucket. If the front wheels sink or encounter high rolling resistance, the one rear wheel will slip easily. That was a problem with mine and I had the larger 17.5" tires on the steer axle. Couldn't much use it after a rain as you'd be shoving the tractor around with the stick or uncurling the bucket to keep moving. It was just too heavy for practical use IMO. That however in fairness could have been because of the extra weight of the X-hoe on the back.
It was an animal when dry and digging however.
Thanks for the tip!I can confidently say that you will never find new connecting rods for it.
The same goes for the timing gears.
Crankshaft, probably.
I bought a new camshaft from Abilene machine for my 301.
If you do reassemble it, I would advise you to put the exhaust manifold on the two and torque the bolts BEFORE you tighten the head bolts.
If you don't do that, the manifold may break when it gets hot because the heads are not in perfect alignment with each other.
I've been chatting with a friend who builds custom tracks for anything that has wheels. No final decision has been made yet, but he said it would be around $8,000 for him to put tracks on the rear of it in place of tires which would give it several times the traction as well as better weight distribution.If you are operating in soft sandy soil you probably will find that tractor a hindrance to operate with a full bucket. If the front wheels sink or encounter high rolling resistance, the one rear wheel will slip easily. That was a problem with mine and I had the larger 17.5" tires on the steer axle. Couldn't much use it after a rain as you'd be shoving the tractor around with the stick or uncurling the bucket to keep moving. It was just too heavy for practical use IMO. That however in fairness could have been because of the extra weight of the X-hoe on the back.
It was an animal when dry and digging however.
I liked the weight and performance of the machine when it was dry. It would perform very well and was basically a rubber tired excavator. However driving it down the road with the imbalance that was part of the machine was almost unsafe. It may not apply to you but it wasn't worth starting the engine to push an inch of snow the traction was so bad. You could however pick up and carry an eight foot long section of concrete sidewalk without ever increasing engine speed above low idle. It was very powerful. Ripping tree roots could be done at 1200 engine rpm with sharp edges on a single pull. I did many to build my shop.I've been chatting with a friend who builds custom tracks for anything that has wheels. No final decision has been made yet, but he said it would be around $8,000 for him to put tracks on the rear of it in place of tires which would give it several times the traction as well as better weight distribution.
My thought was to run it as is, see how it handles out here in the desert, then make a decision.
I can confidently say that you will never find new connecting rods for it.
The same goes for the timing gears.
Crankshaft, probably.
I bought a new camshaft from Abilene machine for my 301.
If you do reassemble it, I would advise you to put the exhaust manifold on the two and torque the bolts BEFORE you tighten the head bolts.
If you don't do that, the manifold may break when it gets hot because the heads are not in perfect alignment with each other.
So as a matter of opinion, if the money wasn't an issue, and the machine was never going to leave a ranch operation in the desert, if it were your machine would you just bite the bullet and put tracks on the rear?I liked the weight and performance of the machine when it was dry. It would perform very well and was basically a rubber tired excavator. However driving it down the road with the imbalance that was part of the machine was almost unsafe. It may not apply to you but it wasn't worth starting the engine to push an inch of snow the traction was so bad. You could however pick up and carry an eight foot long section of concrete sidewalk without ever increasing engine speed above low idle. It was very powerful. Ripping tree roots could be done at 1200 engine rpm with sharp edges on a single pull. I did many to build my shop.
No argument here, you are 100% correct in your logic for almost every situation.No. I think you would be much better suited with an "E" or later series 580 Case myself with 4X4 which is much more rounded. That however is just my opinion. The780CK fit a market at that time but that time has passed with other machines replacing it's dominancy. Now those machines too are aging and becoming affordable to the novice.
Not to be negative at all and you made purchase cheap, I fully understand that. However at this point you have the horse several reign lengths behind the cart and that needs corrected. First thing to do, (again, my opinion) is to ensure that engine will rotate. If it does, check the oil for water fouling by pulling the drain plug and looking. If water, or coolant is found, drop the oil pan and fill the cooling system with a mixture of used but clean coolant, or simply water and an iridescent dye marketed for the purpose. Pressurize the cooling system to 20 psi and from under the tractor look for the leak into the oil pan with a bright UV lamp and the leak will reveal itself readily if one exists. Then address this leak if found.
I feel you need to get onto a systematic approach to making a repair. Again my opinion worth what's paid but you are not on the correct path and I mean nothing negative there. Start by breaking the problem into blocks and find what goes in but doesn't go out, (figuratively). Right now you know as much about that tractor as I do and many on here would like to help you find resolution but you need to align with what is needed done.
Again, just my opinions and I mean nothing negative at all. You've got some good intellect willing to help you but only you can listen. I hope that doesn't sound caustic as not meant to be.
Thanks,
Once I start tearing into the machine I think I am going to start a new thread to document the whole process and share what I find and all the steps.
I was thinking because this thread will be 5 or 6 pages in before i even get to the documenting and this has been more a Q & A threadWhy would you do that? Nothing in this thread is out of line, keep it all in one place.
If you are serious about this venture, this thread will probably turn into 50 pages.I was thinking because this thread will be 5 or 6 pages in before i even get to the documenting and this has been more a Q & A thread
Challenge accepted!If you are serious about this venture, this thread will probably turn into 50 pages.
If you and us are lucky, lol.
You have 29 posts.
Nige has over 25,000.

The rods are probably fine, as I'm sure half the parts I will be replacing in the engine will be, but the same as I do when I have done the old diesel trucks, as long as I have it on apart, I will replace what I can to avoid tearing apart again in the future.