• Thank you for visiting HeavyEquipmentForums.com! Our objective is to provide industry professionals a place to gather to exchange questions, answers and ideas. We welcome you to register using the "Register" icon at the top of the page. We'd appreciate any help you can offer in spreading the word of our new site. The more members that join, the bigger resource for all to enjoy. Thank you!

$454

Truck Shop

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 7, 2015
Messages
25,346
Location
WWW.
Procrastinated about posting but what the heck.
Started on one of two identical 454 chevy rebuilds for one ton 4x4 tow trucks, outside work I guess.
Both are old LS-5's gen IV, early 70's, 1974's to be exact, low power/torque engines built during the
oil embargo of 1973. Chevy detuned the 454 which came out in 1970 rated up to 450 hp and was
said it was a conservative figure put on it for insurance reasons, although no dyno proof it was 500 hp.
1974 versions were rated at 215 & 235 horse power and 360 torque. With a compression ratio of 8.2
and 7.8 depending on cylinder head combustion chamber CC's, chevy made closed and open chamber
heads ranging from 99 to 122 CC's using flat top 2 & 4 valve relief pistons and a steel shim head gasket.
Camshafts were really small, 196 intake & 200 duration @ .050 lift which was 215 & 230 advertised
duration. Lift was really low 398 and 415 advertised. The real low profile intake manifolds were basically
nothing more than a place to mount a 4 barrel, and the Quadrajet was 600 to 650 cfm but wasn't a
real problem. There were 750 & 800 CFM Q-jets which can be distinguished by a small bump inside
bottom of primary venturi's. Heads were either 2.07 or 2.19 intake valves, but 2.07's work just fine
for mild power gains.
----Both of these engine will get a compression ratio bump to 9.1 with 100 thousands tall hypereutectic
dome pistons. To figure that a formula of bore and stroke with compression height, a dome volume of
-10.50 and deck clearance with head gasket figured in gives compression ratio. Hypereutectic pistons
reflect allot of heat back to combustion chamber so a real critical step is ring gap, wider by double for
top ring and a few thousands for second ring. A standard gap for a bore over 4" is .004 for inch of bore
diameter. The gap for towing is figured @ .008, so 8 x 4.25 = .034 top ring gap and .018 for second.
Reason--the heat transfer to top ring can close the gap breaking piston ring lands destroying pistons
and scratching the bore. Plus a little extra piston skirt clearance @ .004 will have it run well.
---Cylinder heads are 241 castings with 113 CC chambers 2.07 valves, oval ports. a common head
back then. With stock ratio-stock sled rockers and 3/8" diameter pushrods, Chevy also made them with
5/16 pushrods. Roller rockers or roller tip rockers really add {zero hp gain} unless a higher ratio &
combined with a roller cam, stock ratio is 1.7.
---Camshaft I will use will be a Comp Cams 260 flat tappet. Single pattern @ 112 lobe center 206* duration
@ .050 lift both intake and exhaust which is 260* duration advertised and .475 lift. Would like use a
Howards Cam 263*/.488 lift but none in circulation and would be a 3 month wait. Anything over 268*
duration and vacuum drops and makes for lousy power brakes and around town drivability. Plus a cam
for this application needs to have a working range of 1000 to 4500 rpm, with a fairly smooth idle.
---Carb will be a Edelbrock 650 AVS-{air valve secondary} mechanical. With this configuration for street
it only requires 610 cfm. With a medium rise aluminum intake and 1 5/8 headers.
---Should produce 390 hp and roughly 450 lbs torque. Will have a few photos when assembling.
One I built some years back---485 hp below.
*
100_0367.jpg100_0415.jpg100_0366.jpg
 

56wrench

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 4, 2016
Messages
2,492
Location
alberta
Reminds me of a 454 i built back in about ‘80. Flat top pistons with good-sized valve reliefs, oval port oc heads but i opened them up to 2.19 in and 1.88 ex, minor port cleanup, notched the cyl bores, double valve springs with teflon seals and a healthy cam with a nice rumble. Stuffed it into my ‘77 camaro. Exhaust manfolds because i didn’t want to deal with leaky headers. Big factory 4 row rad with matching shroud. I had to trim the air cleaner stud to close the hood. Factory q jet with some minor jetting and metering rod changes. It was a real sleeper. I wish i knew what cam i used but i lost the specs—it worked really well for what i wanted. I traded that car to my brother—i wish i had kept it. I got my old ‘69 chevelle back and assembled a .030 over 402 for it with a crane fireball cam. It ran pretty good but not near as good as that 454. Ah, to be young again:)
 

Truck Shop

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 7, 2015
Messages
25,346
Location
WWW.
with teflon seals a
When I worked auto machine I cut allot of valve guides for Perfect Circle positive valve stem seals.
I never liked those--it was extra money for machine shops but used in a personal vehicle it was a
bad choice, dried the valve guides, not enough oil. Especially with Ford FE heads, those had bad
rocker/valve geometry to begin with--positive seals just made the guides deteriorate faster.
 

56wrench

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 4, 2016
Messages
2,492
Location
alberta
If i recall, at the time those seals were about all i could find. They were Trw i think. I couldn’t use the orange umbrella type because they wouldn’t fit inside the valve springs. I still have the tool to machine the end of the guides. If i recall, the BBC had fairly hard guides compared to some other engines. I heard many years later that the guy who had it after my brother, finally blew it up. Probably dropped a valve or took out the bottom end but by then it was probably getting worn out
 

Truck Shop

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 7, 2015
Messages
25,346
Location
WWW.
If i recall, at the time those seals were about all i could find. They were Trw i think. I couldn’t use the orange umbrella type because they wouldn’t fit inside the valve springs. I still have the tool to machine the end of the guides. If i recall, the BBC had fairly hard guides compared to some other engines. I heard many years later that the guy who had it after my brother, finally blew it up. Probably dropped a valve or took out the bottom end but by then it was probably getting worn out
Yes back then the high tension valve springs took up allot of room, these days it's common to
run {Bee Hive} style. TRW bought/owned Perfect Circle. I remember when air powered/pneumatic
valve spring compressors arrived on the scene. I built 4 engines for the owner of the auto machine
I worked at. I sold him 4 SCJ 429 long block core engines. I filled all the water jackets with {Block-
Rock} to a level 1" below fire deck, so coolant only had a 1" coolant jacket in block, done to keep
cylinder walls from flexing/cracking at high rpm. Comp Cams engineered the roller cams-----------
326 duration @ .780 lift. The special valve springs sent with--the pneumatic compressor couldn't
compress to install valve locks, had to build a helper piece for the cylinder head bench.
---IIRC the intakes were 2.40, mass amount of porting. With all the supper high dollar valve train
it was $7,000 just in camshaft and valve train. The blocks were sent out {we didn't have equipment
to do machining} 4 bolt bottom ends, splayed, IIRC. Aftermarket 460 cranks & rods. Topped of
with 360* Offenhauser tunnel ram topped with two Barry Grant 1050 cfm Holley's, just toilets.
Idled at 2,500 rpm. I never went to see any of them perform, truck pulling was boring to me.
 

Truck Shop

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 7, 2015
Messages
25,346
Location
WWW.
One of my favorite little known engine---Oldsmobile W43-subed from a 455 Rocket.
Was designed to kill the muscle car competition, mainly with in GM. GM only allowed
multiple carbs on the Corvette, so as to keep HP/torque figures high for sales. So in
the mid 60's Olds started to design a single carb monster which was the W43. Only
two were built, emissions and insurance killed the idea by 1970.
--It was a four valve per cylinder non hemi head, even though it looks like it could
have been with spark plugs in center of combustion chamber. It had valve train
geometry issues so a raised camshaft with removable lifter gally was designed. At
10.1 compression it produced 440 horse power, although it was reported but never
verified that a version produced 560 @ only 4,600 rpm. There is one known to still
exist that was installed by a privet party in a 1970 442 that runs. But like so many
things there is the LS11 reworked 409 punched to 427 that is just about as rare,
along with the aluminum block 427 Camaro just as rare.
*
OIP.jpegW43headsCARS-2.jpgliftergalleries_HR.jpg
 

56wrench

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 4, 2016
Messages
2,492
Location
alberta
I remember reading a magazine article on that Olds engine. Buick, Olds and Pontiac never seemed to get as much love as Chevrolet probably due to the parts being a lot more expensive, at least around here, and the very limited availability of the hi-performance variants in the wrecking yards
 

Truck Shop

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 7, 2015
Messages
25,346
Location
WWW.
I remember reading a magazine article on that Olds engine. Buick, Olds and Pontiac never seemed to get as much love as Chevrolet probably due to the parts being a lot more expensive, at least around here, and the very limited availability of the hi-performance variants in the wrecking yards
This guy was responsible--Arkus.
*th.jpeg
 

Truck Shop

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 7, 2015
Messages
25,346
Location
WWW.
My favorite--- I have one setting complete in a 67 Chrysler. The B block 383, there was also
a RB {raised block} version same variety as 413, 426 & 440 RB's, but was only produced
in early 60's with a different stroke of 3.750 & bore of 4.030, very rare. The standard B block
383 used the same .075 lower deck wedge block as the 361. Same short stroke 3.375 & a
large 4.250 bore. Which enabled the 383 to hit high rpm, a favorite of law enforcement.
Highest output was in 1969/70 330 hp @ 460 lbs torque, very high torque rating which made
it a engine to deal with.
*
R.jpeg2560px-1969_Plymouth_Road_Runner_383-1024x768.jpg
 

Truck Shop

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 7, 2015
Messages
25,346
Location
WWW.
other is possible 440 haven't dug far enough yet to be sure
440 produced from 66 to 79. Still it could even be a 400, which can be stroked to a 451 using
a 440 reworked crank for stroke. The 400 had the biggest bore of any production Chrysler
V8's at the time, same 3.375-3 3/8" stroke as a B but with a bore of 4.342. Huge bore short
stroke. But if it came out of a motor home it has two choices 413 or 440. Still worth keeping
because people are still looking for them. If was by chance a 66/67 the cylinder heads are
very sought after large port, in 68 those shrank.
 

petepilot

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 7, 2018
Messages
2,245
Location
central shenandoah valley va,
440 produced from 66 to 79. Still it could even be a 400, which can be stroked to a 451 using
a 440 reworked crank for stroke. The 400 had the biggest bore of any production Chrysler
V8's at the time, same 3.375-3 3/8" stroke as a B but with a bore of 4.342. Huge bore short
stroke. But if it came out of a motor home it has two choices 413 or 440. Still worth keeping
because people are still looking for them. If was by chance a 66/67 the cylinder heads are
very sought after large port, in 68 those shrank.
Both 66 and running still in the cars
 

Truck Shop

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 7, 2015
Messages
25,346
Location
WWW.
This was the compact killer--the 340 Six Pack. By all written accounts it was advertised
at 290 hp but several were dyno tested and produced well over 300 plus and almost
400 lbs torque. With 2.02 intakes, 3.31 stroke & 4.040 bore it was a torquey little monster.
A friend had a 70 Dart Swinger 340 Six Pack 4 speed, it killed several Z28's.
*
OIP (2).jpeg
 
Top