• Thank you for visiting HeavyEquipmentForums.com! Our objective is to provide industry professionals a place to gather to exchange questions, answers and ideas. We welcome you to register using the "Register" icon at the top of the page. We'd appreciate any help you can offer in spreading the word of our new site. The more members that join, the bigger resource for all to enjoy. Thank you!

Dozers and operator cabs

Wulf

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2006
Messages
584
Location
Canada
There is one reason no one has stepped up to the plate: cost. First, there's only two big names in big dozers to begin with: Cat and Komatsu (listed alphabetically). When a manufacturer sells forty frames in a ten-year period, which is approximately what the D575 has sold, there's really no incentive for another one to join in unless it is confident it can push the other one out entirely. The costs to develop a D575-sized "D12" would be astronomical -- economies of scale (and just doubling the size on everything) might not hold up perfectly. Furthermore, Cat won't take the financial risk of selling, what, four machines a year -- maximum -- to offset what would probably be a several-million dollar product introduction.

For another manufacturer (except one) to develop such a large dozer is even more preposturous. No one has large-dozer experience (Liebherr is just getting a D9-sized machine), and to start from scratch, well, probably not likely. The company I could envision doing one or two large dozers would be LeTourneau -- they already make the largest wheel loader, so they have experience in huge machines. The issue is, even they don't have any tracked models, and the UC is going to be most likely the biggest design headache.

Ultimately, I just don't see it happening. The D575 is a pretty specialized dozer; you don't see it on road construction projects or pulling scrapers. I doubt Cat would take the risk (and I doubt its beloved shareholders would allow it to take the risk) to build a machine that might or might not sell and only in a handful per year.

As usual you make some good points Tigerotor but I think by natural progression a bigger dozer will come and I think it will eventually come from Caterpillar.
 

Deas Plant

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 21, 2006
Messages
1,533
Location
Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
Bigger Dozers

Hi, Folks.
I faintly suspect that there are a LOT of companies around the world with huge volumes of earth and rock to move - and probably move a second time before they are through with it - who would early love a bigger CAT dozer right now.

Sure, there IS a bigger dozer in production today than those made by Cat. Trouble is, it's NOT made by Cat and it has proven itself to not have a long working life. How many of the few sold are still working?

We have a contractor not far from where I live who has re-powered D11's with bigger engines and modified them to handle the extra grunt to provide a better service for his clients and most of his work is root or blade plowing. He NEEDS to be able to move his machines as easily as a D11 can be moved.

Most of the jobs where bigger dozers would be viable are long-term jobs with HUGE volumes of material to be moved and it has been shown that BIG dozers are hard to beat for cost effectiveness over short distances.

I'm not holding my breath waitng for it but I suspect that bigger dozers are going to come along, probably with modular construction, so that they can be assembled for work and dis-assembled for transport with minimum fuss and minimum technology. Buster Peterson designed his Saimese D8's to be assembled and stripped by ordinary workmen with fairly minimal tools and there were NO fluid connections to work with.

Just for chuckles, try this sucker on for size. The HEAVIEST and the seond most powerful dozer so far built, the Acco dozer has never struck a blow 'in anger'. At 183 tons and with 2 x 675 hp Cat V8's, it iS a fair lump of iron.
 

Attachments

  • Acco dozer and FA 41B dozer_1_WS.jpg
    Acco dozer and FA 41B dozer_1_WS.jpg
    40.3 KB · Views: 19,828
  • Acco dozer_1B_WS.jpg
    Acco dozer_1B_WS.jpg
    38.9 KB · Views: 33,422
  • Acco dozer_1C_WS.jpg
    Acco dozer_1C_WS.jpg
    42.4 KB · Views: 11,313
  • Acco1.jpg
    Acco1.jpg
    33.9 KB · Views: 10,938

Mike J

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 5, 2006
Messages
61
Location
Pa
Thats a big dozer. It looks like they used the high drive sprocket as well as another drive sprocket in the rear. Did they use one engine to power the high drive and one to power the rear? Did Acco make all the components or did they use other cat stuff from big cats to build it?
 

Deas Plant

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 21, 2006
Messages
1,533
Location
Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
Questions???????????????????????

Hi, MikeJ.
Will ya shuddup and stop asking questions for which I don't have answers. Woddaya tryin' ter do? Make me look iggerant er sumpin?

To put it a little more politely, I do know that it has two Cat diesels. I seriously doubt that one was driving the upper sprockets and one the lower. The synchronisation issues would be enormous. I even doubt that they would have had one driving each side. I'm more inclined to think that they merged the power from the two engines into one transmission and then to normal crawler clutches and brakes steering but I DON'T know. I have been told that the pairs of sprockets on each side were driven together by a gear train.

I also gather that it and a 200 ton grader never went to the job for which they were intended in Libya because of trade embargoes imposed against Libya at the time of the Lockerbie plane bombing. I have been told that neither has ever turned a paying blade of earth. On top of that, Acco also built a 160 ton prototype of his grader before he built the 'real' one.

Here are a few photos of this li'l' jigger for the blade hands here.
 

Attachments

  • Acco grader 200 tons 1,700 hp_1_HEF.JPG
    Acco grader 200 tons 1,700 hp_1_HEF.JPG
    37.5 KB · Views: 11,876
  • Grader2-1.jpg
    Grader2-1.jpg
    21.6 KB · Views: 10,578
  • Grader2-4.jpg
    Grader2-4.jpg
    13.2 KB · Views: 10,515
  • Grader2-3.jpg
    Grader2-3.jpg
    17.1 KB · Views: 12,061
  • Grader2-2.jpg
    Grader2-2.jpg
    19.7 KB · Views: 10,516

Deas Plant

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 21, 2006
Messages
1,533
Location
Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
More Of Same - Dull And Boring, I Know But..........

More of same plus one of an HD41, a D10, another HD41 and the Acco dozer.
 

Attachments

  • Grader2-5.jpg
    Grader2-5.jpg
    15.7 KB · Views: 10,568
  • HD41, D10, HD41, Acco dozers_1_WS.jpg
    HD41, D10, HD41, Acco dozers_1_WS.jpg
    38.4 KB · Views: 24,186

dirtworksequip

Active Member
Joined
Mar 22, 2007
Messages
30
Location
West Virginia
EROPS vs OROPS

The way I see the EROPS vs OROPS is this. While cabs are alot more expensive up front, over the long run they will probably pay for themselves with increased productivity and owner or employee satisfaction,because of a more comfortable operating enviorment. Some of the big name excavating contractors that I have worked for now have very few orops machines. They are just phasing them out and replacing any new machines with cab models. Eventually because of health issues, you probably will not even be able to purchase an OROPS machine. Maybe not in my lifetime,but eventually.When buying any machine for myself I always opt for a cab model..........but of course I'm getting old and soft.lol There is a certain amount of lost visibility with any cab model,but the advantages far outweigh that one disadvantage. One thing I hate to see is anyone get on a new cab machine and throw the doors and windows open.Geez! I feel if a company is going to pay the extra money for a cab I should keep it sealed up tight and as clean as possible. I realize that some operators feel they can't hear or see as good out of a closed up cab,but its just gettting used to a little different sound and different sight lines. So, keep them cabs closed up and clean.
Sincerely,
Dirt
 

deeredude

Active Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2007
Messages
27
Location
indiana
Hi, Folks.
Just for chuckles, try this sucker on for size. The HEAVIEST and the seond most powerful dozer so far built, the Acco dozer has never struck a blow 'in anger'. At 183 tons and with 2 x 675 hp Cat V8's, it iS a fair lump of iron.

:eek: whats the most powerful then??
 

biggixxerjim

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 6, 2007
Messages
446
Location
New Jerz
:eek: :eek:

Those machines are simply amazing..... Id love to get a look at some of that.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

OzDozer

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
2,207
Location
Perth, Western Australia.
Occupation
Semi-Retired ..
The ACCO dozer is the heaviest and most powerful dozer built.
The D575 on initial release, was 1050 HP, but has since been uprated to 1150 HP.
At 336,420 lb / 152600 kg, with blade, counterweight, cab, ROPS, operator and all lubricants and full tank of fuel, the D575 SD is still a way behind the Acco dozer.

D575 SD specs .. http://www.equipmentcentral.com/north_america/new_equipment/machine_data.cfm?prdt_id=523

Not sure that the production figure of forty D575 machines is correct. According to my S/N book, which is 10 years old, there were 23, D575's built between the release date of 1991, and 1996.
They have been in production for 16 years now, and a likely total production number would be more like, well over 100 machines. There are 5, D575's operating just in the State of Western Australia, that I know of, and possibly more. There are several in Australia that have been parted out.


Umberto Acco used all Cat components in his enormous machines .. and he built two huge (different size) graders, a number of rear dumpers, as well as numerous monstrous 4WD tractors, besides the giant dozer.

His workshop was an incredible size, and littered with components like a Cat factory. He made all his money from civil construction, and spent heaps of it, on building large-scale 'toys' .. :D
Well, they weren't supposed to be toys, originally .. because he built these machines for massive projects in Libya, that Gaddafi had planned.
However, when Gaddafi started on his terrorism line, in the 80's, and the U.N. slapped sanctions on Libya, Acco was left holding the baby, as no-one was allowed to deal with Gaddafi in any commercial manner.

Umberto Acco died a couple of years ago, and his company directors have now 'cleaned up' his workshop (sent everything to scrap), and placed all Umbertos 'dream machines' in a storage shed that is not readily accessible to the public .. and people wishing to inspect the Acco giant machines must obtain Acco Construction Co permission to visit them.

It is not known what will happen to the machines. There is talk of them being put into some kind of 'museum' or public display, but that has not happened yet.

"Small" Acco grader .. http://img262.imageshack.us/img262/2522/accogradersmall1bs1.jpg

Acco rear dumps .. http://img262.imageshack.us/img262/30/accoreardumpskx9.jpg

Acco grader blade visibility - cab view .. :D .. http://img262.imageshack.us/img262/5476/accograder6xb6.jpg

Acco large 4WD tractor .. http://img412.imageshack.us/img412/7003/accotractor1vi1.jpg

Two pics of the Acco workshop, prior to being 'cleaned up' .. :rolleyes:
 

Attachments

  • ACCO spares -1.jpg
    ACCO spares -1.jpg
    58.8 KB · Views: 10,296
  • ACCO spares -2.jpg
    ACCO spares -2.jpg
    55.8 KB · Views: 10,250

Tigerotor77W

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 1, 2004
Messages
1,014
Location
Michigan
Occupation
Engineer
As usual you make some good points Tigerotor but I think by natural progression a bigger dozer will come and I think it will eventually come from Caterpillar.

I could be wrong... 'course that's never happened before. :rolleyes: (bigger 'n a 797B load of sarcasm there...)

Time will tell.
 

Squizzy246B

Administrator
Joined
Sep 9, 2005
Messages
3,388
Location
Perth, Western Australia
Occupation
Digger Driver
There are 5, D575's operating just in the State of Western Australia, that I know of, and possibly more. There are several in Australia that have been parted out.

I think, if you check, that four of them are "operating" and one is......resting a bit. But I could be wrong. Capel sands also had one (whatever they are called now) and they had a real good run pushing ilmenite.
 

Deas Plant

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 21, 2006
Messages
1,533
Location
Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
Heaviest and NOT the most powerful.

Hi, Ozdozer.
I said the heaviest and SECOND most powerful because I know about this baby which worked for 18 years and was scrapped before 'Bertie' ever started building his toys.

Here are some pics taken from a magazine article from 1963, the year the beast was made. Because of the image size limitations of the site, I have had to do some serious chopping of the original article to get it on here. I hope I have got them all in more or less the right order.

More to come.
 

Attachments

  • Western 2000_3_1_1.JPG
    Western 2000_3_1_1.JPG
    64 KB · Views: 10,370
  • Western 2000_3_1A_2.JPG
    Western 2000_3_1A_2.JPG
    24.2 KB · Views: 9,960
  • Western 2000_3_1B_1.jpg
    Western 2000_3_1B_1.jpg
    57.6 KB · Views: 10,141
  • Western 2000_3_1C_1.jpg
    Western 2000_3_1C_1.jpg
    69.4 KB · Views: 10,151
  • Western 2000_3_1D.jpg
    Western 2000_3_1D.jpg
    58.8 KB · Views: 10,238

Deas Plant

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 21, 2006
Messages
1,533
Location
Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
Heaviest and NOT most powerful - More to come_1

More of the same.
 

Attachments

  • Western 2000_3_1E.jpg
    Western 2000_3_1E.jpg
    73.3 KB · Views: 10,159
  • Western 2000_3_1F.jpg
    Western 2000_3_1F.jpg
    55.7 KB · Views: 9,974
  • Western 2000_3_1G.jpg
    Western 2000_3_1G.jpg
    71 KB · Views: 9,982
  • Western 2000_3_1H.jpg
    Western 2000_3_1H.jpg
    29.8 KB · Views: 9,750
  • Western 2000_3_1J.jpg
    Western 2000_3_1J.jpg
    51.4 KB · Views: 9,912

Deas Plant

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 21, 2006
Messages
1,533
Location
Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
And Still More. Monotonous, ain't it?

And still more. Monotonous, ain't it??????????

B-b-b-but th-th-th-thats' all, Folks.
 

Attachments

  • Western 2000_3_1K.jpg
    Western 2000_3_1K.jpg
    78.3 KB · Views: 2,447
  • Western 2000_3_1L.jpg
    Western 2000_3_1L.jpg
    44.3 KB · Views: 2,434
  • Western 2000_3_1M.jpg
    Western 2000_3_1M.jpg
    42.7 KB · Views: 2,438
  • Western 2000_3_1N.jpg
    Western 2000_3_1N.jpg
    54.1 KB · Views: 2,426
  • Western 2000_3_1P.jpg
    Western 2000_3_1P.jpg
    36.5 KB · Views: 2,433

OzDozer

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
2,207
Location
Perth, Western Australia.
Occupation
Semi-Retired ..
There are 5, D575's operating just in the State of Western Australia, that I know of, and possibly more. There are several in Australia that have been parted out.

I think, if you check, that four of them are "operating" and one is......resting a bit. But I could be wrong. Capel sands also had one (whatever they are called now) and they had a real good run pushing ilmenite.
Squizzy - There are 4 x D575's operating at Acoa (all remote-controlled) .. and 1 at Murrin Murrin. Didn't know about a D575 at Capel (now Iluka Resources). Which one is 'resting a bit' .. ?? .. :beatsme
 

Lashlander

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 4, 2007
Messages
1,226
Location
Kodiak Ak.
I love that cab. Western Contracting had a bunch of equipment special made back in their hayday. Times have changed, no handrails or stairs to get in the cab. Excellent post Deas!:thumbsup
 

OzDozer

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
2,207
Location
Perth, Western Australia.
Occupation
Semi-Retired ..
Hi, Ozdozer.
I said the heaviest and SECOND most powerful because I know about this baby which worked for 18 years and was scrapped before 'Bertie' ever started building his toys.
Deas - Hmmm .. (OzD scratches head) .. yeah, O.K. .. I guess you COULD call that Western push dozer, a dozer .. but it's not exactly what I had in mind, when it came to comparing big crawler tractors .. :cool:
 

Squizzy246B

Administrator
Joined
Sep 9, 2005
Messages
3,388
Location
Perth, Western Australia
Occupation
Digger Driver
Squizzy - There are 4 x D575's operating at Acoa (all remote-controlled) .. and 1 at Murrin Murrin. Didn't know about a D575 at Capel (now Iluka Resources). Which one is 'resting a bit' .. ?? .. :beatsme

I assumed that there were 5 at Beenup, not four...anyway, my mate is with GeoBlast, in and out of Alcoa on a regular basis, and he said they had one down for awhile.

We oversaw the load out of the old screening and crusher plant from Murrin Murrin...it was going to South Africa, I was down at Esperance for the final load out. Didn't know they had the big Komatapillar at MM. The 575 down at Capel was one of the first to arrive in the state....it went back to Perth for some modifications and then it went to Eneabba...I think.
 
Top