• Thank you for visiting HeavyEquipmentForums.com! Our objective is to provide industry professionals a place to gather to exchange questions, answers and ideas. We welcome you to register using the "Register" icon at the top of the page. We'd appreciate any help you can offer in spreading the word of our new site. The more members that join, the bigger resource for all to enjoy. Thank you!

Which one?

Which one

  • John deere. The new ones are the best

    Votes: 19 59.4%
  • Are you stupid? Go with Bobcat

    Votes: 13 40.6%

  • Total voters
    32

Cat

Active Member
Joined
Apr 11, 2007
Messages
32
Location
In a house
Hi, thinking about what my next machine should be. I have a john deere 317 and a bobcat s-160. Both are good machines. However the john deere has more power, and is more stable. And cheaper. But I really like the bobcat. John deere is closer. Both have very good service. Bobcat really seems to hold up good. I'm hearing alot of good things about the john deere's now a days.:confused: So please help me decide;)
 

Tigerotor77W

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 1, 2004
Messages
1,014
Location
Michigan
Occupation
Engineer
Different size classes... you really should be comparing the Bobcat S175 or S185 to the Deere. If for your needs the Deere is a better machine, then go with the Deere. Personally, I think you'll find the extra power and stability of the Deere to be worthy down the road, but that being said, whichever dealer gives you the best service and support is likely going to be your better friend.
 

hemiless

Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2007
Messages
8
Location
alaska
I agree with Tigerotor77W go with what ever dealer will give the best service as they are both good machines.

Nathan<><
 

jazak

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 22, 2006
Messages
331
Location
NJ
John Deere makes a nice machine. Bobcat is a little behind with technology and doesn't have nearly as many nice features as a CAT, CASE or John Deere. But it also depends on how your dealer is.
 

Tigerotor77W

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 1, 2004
Messages
1,014
Location
Michigan
Occupation
Engineer
Bobcat is a little behind with technology and doesn't have nearly as many nice features as a ... John Deere.

Er, the Deere cab is a little wider than the Bobcat cab, but the Bobcat cab offers a little more refinement, I'd argue. That may change when Deere releases pilots or EH (I'm betting on EH), but for now, I still think the Bobcat cab wins over that of the Deere. [Course this is just opinion. How can I prove that a cab is "better" for every single person?]
 

Rocket

Active Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2007
Messages
29
Location
MA
It has been a couple years since I drove either one but I found the Bobcat a bit behind in technology too. Not necessarily size or comfort. I found the Deere to be too wide, restricting in view, and the controls too touchy. It was the only machine I have ever had to get pulled out of a job. I imagine they have upgraded both since two years ago. If either one is not yet using pilot controls I wouldn't even consider it.
 

Yellowdog

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2004
Messages
208
I would say the Bobcat is much more comfortable than the CAT B series and looks more comfortable than the New hollands. I take up the whole cab but find I can work all day in the Bobcat and still be comfortable however Bobcat's A/C system sucks. I have had 6 machines with A/C and they all suck.
 

KSSS

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 27, 2005
Messages
4,336
Location
Idaho
Occupation
excavation
I have yet to hear of anyone that has been happy with their Volvo skid steer. There are three in this area and I doubt they will be replaced with another Volvo. They are offering a some kind of killer maintance deal and it is selling a few machines, but It does not sound the machines do a very good job of selling themselves.
 

Noose

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 11, 2007
Messages
121
Location
Stony Plain
Occupation
O/O '98 378 Pete tandem dump ~~ '03 S185
I'm a tall guy and the JD is really tight for leg room, great stability, good power, and traction. Cat has quick hydraulic response and accuracy. I'd like to try bobcats hand control system and JDs EH. But I really like the S185 for overall diversity.
 

Tigerotor77W

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 1, 2004
Messages
1,014
Location
Michigan
Occupation
Engineer
I'm a tall guy and the JD is really tight for leg room, great stability, good power, and traction. Cat has quick hydraulic response and accuracy. I'd like to try bobcats hand control system and JDs EH. But I really like the S185 for overall diversity.

JD's EH? Do you know something we don't? :D
 

ror76a

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 18, 2007
Messages
211
Location
Michigan
I own a Volvo skidsteer, it is a good machine. It is an A sereies machine, and has been a reliable machine, well balanced too. It does definatly lack the technology of other brands (2 speed, pilot controls, ect) but it is a solid machine, and handles my skidsteer work very well.

I also got a killer deal on it. :)
 

Prairie Dog

Active Member
Joined
Mar 23, 2007
Messages
36
Location
Annaheim, SK, Can.
We purchased a Compact Track machine from ASV (RCV) Similar to a RC-100 except this is a vertical lift machine. We were pretty happy with it until this last couple of months. When we purchased the machine we were told that the tracks will have an about 4000 hours before we have to spend much money on them. We cant replace the machine but we just dropped about $3500 into the tracks after 800 hours. We have been very disipointed with that machine. We had to replace all the bearings in the tracks. This is the same track system that is used on the Cat Track machines. We would be tempted to go to Either Bobcat, John Deere or Case. Whomever has the best service and most reliable machine.
 

KSSS

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 27, 2005
Messages
4,336
Location
Idaho
Occupation
excavation
They certainly fed you a line on 4000 hour replacement on rubber tracks. No ones tracks will give that kind of life. I am sure they did not back that up in writing. The issue with those tracks (and CATs as they are the same) is that is seldom just the tracks that need to be replaced. If you got by with just tracks consider yourself lucky. Tracks both suspended and rigid don't handle abuse well. What is considered abuse may surprise you. There is no doubt they can be more productive than tires but they can also cost a lot more to maintain which means you have to be charging enough to cover the costs and see a significant enough productivity increase to justify the tracks. As far as who builds a better tracked machine is of course up for much debate. At the end of the day the tracks at least those on rigid under carriages are not that different (Bridgestone seems to be the OEM of choice from the factory of most machines). Maybe the first place to look is to see if the work your doing with the machine justifies the tracks in the first place. My opinions on your alternative machines is that the CASE and Deere will give you the most push power, the CASE will have the best control system (pilots), Bobcat has the nicer cab of either machine. I don't think that Bobcat is that heavy duty of machine and they have struggled with drive motor problems in the past. The thing to do would be to bring a few out on demo and see what fits your operation. The models would be Deere 332, CASE 450 and Bobcat T300. All would compare with your machine. The CASE is radial lift in that size. The vertical lift machine (465 based) will be out after the first of the year I was told.
 

TALLRICK

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 28, 2007
Messages
195
Location
florida
Personally I am surprised that no manufacturer has come out with a segmented track system like some aftermarket companies have. The big rubber band track is a HUGE waste of resources as it cannot be used after its worn. I have seen the segmented rubber tracks with replaceable rubber inserts (McLaren hybrid) and they are amazing on mini-ex's. One of these days I am going to make my own set of steel tracks with rubber inserts, if I ever get a skid steer project.
 
Top