• Thank you for visiting HeavyEquipmentForums.com! Our objective is to provide industry professionals a place to gather to exchange questions, answers and ideas. We welcome you to register using the "Register" icon at the top of the page. We'd appreciate any help you can offer in spreading the word of our new site. The more members that join, the bigger resource for all to enjoy. Thank you!

PH 5700. My early days.

alco

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 7, 2006
Messages
1,289
Location
here
Tire size was a limiting factor with pretty much every size increase they have had for years. Not much of an issue, they simply have to make a larger tire. Problem solved.

Why would they have to go to 180 metric tonnes per pass? Make the machine to handle a 150 imperial ton load, and you could 3 pass a 450 ton truck. The bucket size would depend entirely on material density, so there would be a whole variety of options depending on what they were loading I have a feeling that's the next real size range we'll see. I agree they likely won't call it a 5700, but a guy can dream.

I have yet to see the pictures, but one guy from Wajax told me that he has seen pics of the new machine under construction.
 

Ross

Senior Member
Joined
May 29, 2007
Messages
357
Location
In the Rockies
Well 180 metric is a two pass on a 360 metric haul unit. Basically my original point about miss match loading.

A 150 US ton is around 135 metric pass. An XPC ain't far off that. Not sure if we will see larger than 400 metric ton haulers. Think they might have hit the limit unless they go tandem. Don't know If you have any info on anything that big?

I think the next generation will be a steady three pass on a 797, T282 Size truck. Komatsu's haven't suggested a 360 metric yet.

Tires mmm that's a weird on. The WA1200 here needs a break now and then because of tire heat, basically they don't make to many that size. This would be a huge problem for a company that ordered a large fleet of super haulers. Problems are there to be solved.

Who knows?

P.S: you bet your arse I'de like to see a 5700 XPC or
Similar.
 
Last edited:

alco

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 7, 2006
Messages
1,289
Location
here
Well 180 metric is a two pass on a 360 metric haul unit. Basically my original point about miss match loading.

A 150 US ton is around 135 metric pass. An XPC ain't far off that. Not sure if we will see larger than 400 metric ton haulers. Think they might have hit the limit unless they go tandem. Don't know If you have any info on anything that big?

Keep in mind, you don't necessarily put the biggest bucket on a machine if it will handle it. If a machine had an ultimate capacity of 150 tons per pass, you could fit it with a slightly smaller bucket to three pass load your 400 ton trucks. But you can't throw on a larger bucket and expect the smaller shovel to handle it with no issues over time. Therefore, if you upsized the shovel capacity while in the design stages, you could utilize the larger machine to handle a larger array of buckets.

A 4100 XPC only has a capacity of 120 tons, or 109 tonnes.......that's a long ways from 136 tonnes when you add up the passes. You're talking 3/4 of a bucket on top of the three passes, so I'd say it is far off.

I think the next generation will be a steady three pass on a 797, T282 Size truck. Komatsu's haven't suggested a 360 metric yet.

By introducing a larger shovel that could 3 pass a 400 ton truck, or 3 pass a 450 ton truck, you'd have a machine that would appeal to more operators, than one that has a capacity aimed solely at one size class. If they're putting in the time, effort and money to build a larger shovel, might as well get as much bang for your buck as possible. So why not go bigger, as in able to 3 pass a 450 ton truck, instead of handicapping yourself right off the bat? I seem to remember the 795 was aimed around the 150 ton range.

Komatsu has to be able to catch up to the rest of the pack to play. Right now, they're living in the past........back when the 360 ton/326 tonne trucks were introduced. They have failed to step up to the same level their main competition is playing at, and their sales of the 360 ton trucks will suffer as a result....especially at the price they have put on them.


Tires mmm that's a weird on. The WA1200 here needs a break now and then because of tire heat, basically they don't make to many that size. This would be a huge problem for a company that ordered a large fleet of super haulers. Problems are there to be solved.

Just remember, loader tires, and haul truck tires are two very different animals. They initially tried using haul truck tires when building large loaders years ago. It didn't work well then, and doing the opposite won't work well now, or they would have put the larger loader tires on haul trucks already. Yes, there are issues to overcome, but with time, they will do it. I can see a larger truck in the future, but when.....that's the million dollar question right now.
 

alco

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 7, 2006
Messages
1,289
Location
here
80 yd hybrid mmmm Am sure you will spill the beans if it ever gets built?

The info is evolving as we speak, and development and construction is underway. Latest word is that it's either a 70 or 72 yard bucket, and from the pics I have seen, it's going to be something else.....good or bad, not quite sure yet, but something else none the less.
 
Top