• Thank you for visiting HeavyEquipmentForums.com! Our objective is to provide industry professionals a place to gather to exchange questions, answers and ideas. We welcome you to register using the "Register" icon at the top of the page. We'd appreciate any help you can offer in spreading the word of our new site. The more members that join, the bigger resource for all to enjoy. Thank you!

Old R model Mack

BKrois

Charter Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2003
Messages
152
Location
Connecticut
Occupation
Multi purpose
These are photos of my friends dad's R model dump. The truck is a 1967 Mack R model. It was a 6 wheeler tractor pulling a dump trailer for Stamford Demolition. It originally had a 711 diesel in it, a 20 speed twin stick (aka Quad box) and a 29,500 lb rear end. The truck was stolen and kept in a hanger for a few years. When it was recovered, Stamford House Wrecking did not want it so Bridgeport Mack took it in. My friends father bought the truck in 1977 and put the dump body on. The truck was rolled at one time and that's why the top of the cab is messed up. The truck now has a 237 mack engine in it and still has the quadbox. While it's not pretty, it works every day. He has a mint cab for the truck in his garage, but hasn't put it on the truck yet.

Here's the first photo from the rear.
 

Attachments

  • picture 039(1).jpg
    picture 039(1).jpg
    53.8 KB · Views: 7,691

BKrois

Charter Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2003
Messages
152
Location
Connecticut
Occupation
Multi purpose
Here's a shot from the front-
 

Attachments

  • picture 041(1).jpg
    picture 041(1).jpg
    52.8 KB · Views: 2,893

CAT245ME

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2006
Messages
86
Location
Fredericton N.B Canada
Occupation
Cat 972H Loader operator
Here in Fredericton there is a company that has more than a few of these R model macks equiped with dump trailers that haul sand for about 8 months a year then sit in the winter (never see salt), they look to be in great shape. I heard that the oldest was a 1977 and the odometers have cliqued over at least a couple times.
 

RonG

Charter Member
Joined
Dec 2, 2003
Messages
1,833
Location
Meriden ct
Occupation
heavy equipment operator
I didn't know that the 711 ever made it to the new style cabs,that is after the "B" models.Ron G
 

kshansen

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2012
Messages
11,184
Location
Central New York, USA
Occupation
Retired Mechanic in Stone Quarry
I didn't know that the 711 ever made it to the new style cabs,that is after the "B" models.Ron G

We had many 711's in DM800's back in the day. Which is basically the same cab as the R, except they have the steel front fenders with the "Butterfly hoods". I know where there is a left front fender for a DM 800 that has never been on a truck, just the factory black primer! If someone needed it I could make it disappear! I believe that "20 speed" is actually considered an 18 speed. As I recall there are two gears that you are not suppose to use. I was told once that if you did it would damage something but actually I believe the real story is that two of the gears are duplicates of others so no real reason to use them.
 

Scrub Puller

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 29, 2009
Messages
3,481
Location
Gladstone Queensland Australia
Yair . . . kshansen

I believe the real story is that two of the gears are duplicates of others so no real reason to use them.

There was a lot of folk lore about those transmissions, but I believe you are right . . . in fact it was even worse.

I have forgotten the details but on some of the trucks that ended up over here on some sequences if you followed logical progression going down through the boxes you could in fact be shifting up . . . disconcerting to say the least.

On the triplexes if you ignored third gear in the joey box and just treated it as a bog cog and ran that second lever as a splitter it was a similar deal . . .if you used fifth/low and then changed to fourth/high you were actually shifting up.

It is strange how things are different in our countries. I find that little short azzed body on a single drive to be really disconcerting on such a truck.

I will stand correcting by some of the Aussie truck blokes but I have never seen one and I think they are almost unheard of over here . . . perhaps down south?

Cheers.
 
Last edited:

RonG

Charter Member
Joined
Dec 2, 2003
Messages
1,833
Location
Meriden ct
Occupation
heavy equipment operator
That is the reason,two duplicate ratios and I used to know what the were but I'm pretty sure that it was a combination of first in the auxilliary and maybe third in the main because deep under was about equal to to two gears in the main box to maybe 2nd in the main box and high split or third low split to duplicate each other.Mathmatically there were 18 speeds but logically there would have been been 20.I don't recall ever seeing a problem with that transmission and if you greased the shift rails in it it was a nice shifting tranny as well.
I drove the DM800 for years but they always had the 673 or the Maxidyne 675 in them.I am pretty sure that the drivers manual had a diagram of the gear ratios in it.Ron G
 
Last edited:

kshansen

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2012
Messages
11,184
Location
Central New York, USA
Occupation
Retired Mechanic in Stone Quarry
I would have to say that of all the Quadraplex transmissions we had 90% of the failures I saw were failed reverse idler gears. Most likely operator abused. Most of our trucks were used for stocking trucks in stone quarries and a long haul from loading to dumping would have been 1/2 mile. So in an 8 to 10 hour shift reverse was used a lot more than an over the road truck.
 
Top