1. Thank you for visiting HeavyEquipmentForums.com! Our objective is to provide industry professionals a place to gather to exchange questions, answers and ideas. We welcome you to register using the "Register" icon at the top of the page. We'd appreciate any help you can offer in spreading the word of our new site. The more members that join, the bigger resource for all to enjoy. Thank you!

Grader operator shot at

Discussion in 'Motor Graders' started by 20/80, Feb 4, 2018.

  1. DIYDAVE

    DIYDAVE Senior Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2007
    Messages:
    620
    Location:
    MD
    Problem with gun laws is they disarm those who would only use them for good purposes. Most CC permit holders realize the basic rules of good shooting, like having a clean shot, with a back stop, that keep the bullet from ricocheting, or not firing toward a bad guy in a crowd of innocents. Lets not forget that sometimes a gun is pulled by a good guy, and this causes a perp to reconsider using his.

    Perps have no such compunctions, nor training.

    I won't call US law perfect, but I will not be threatened with physical harm, without considering my options. Here in the peoples republic of MD, I have pulled a gun 2x, and am still alive. No shootings, just the display. Both were on my own property. Now I have somewhat of a rep as a mean b*****d, among certain elements of this community. The bad reputation works great at deterrence, too...
     
  2. 63 caveman

    63 caveman Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2017
    Messages:
    64
    Location:
    western Pa.
    "If he had a weapon, he was out for trouble for sure, and I would never diss an American's rite to carry, but we can't, and there were more gun deaths in Chicago than in all of Canada"

    What is odd is Chicago has the most strictest gun laws in the US; So what is up with that?
     
  3. ovrszd

    ovrszd Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2008
    Messages:
    746
    Occupation:
    Retired Army
    Location:
    Missouri
    Yep. What we need are more "people" laws and less "gun" laws. :)

    I agree with running him over!!!!
     
  4. ovrszd

    ovrszd Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2008
    Messages:
    746
    Occupation:
    Retired Army
    Location:
    Missouri
    I've read discussions about Australia's gun laws before. They appear to be working. Is it because the penalties are more severe? Hard to have a broad stroke discussion about penalties. Just wondering if the potential penalty is more of a deterent than the gun law??
     
  5. Queenslander

    Queenslander Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2009
    Messages:
    630
    Location:
    Australia
    Well, I don’t claim to be an expert on the subject, but I believe the biggest single reason is the dramatic reduction in the number of guns in the community.
    The gov. banned all semi autos twenty years ago and bought back all illegal guns at market value.
    They greatly tightened licencing requirements,it now takes about a month to go through the process.
    You have to be a “fit and proper person”, no drugs or violence convictions in the past five years, no domestic violence orders etc. etc.
    You have to have a reason to licence a firearm... own a rural property greater than about twenty acres, be a recreational shooter with either permission to shoot on a nominated property of the same size or a member of a recognised club, be a collector or in certain security occupations.
    I own a rural property and have two rifles and a shotgun which have to be store in a dedicated gun safe, a solid steel cabinet securely bolted, from within, to the floor and wall.
    Iam subject to an audit at any time, the cops can arrive unannounced and demand to see my guns and check that they are adequately stored.
    As you would expect, all this was hugely unpopular at the time,mainly in regional areas.
    I honestly can’t tell you what the penalties are other than losing the right to own a gun.
     
  6. ovrszd

    ovrszd Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2008
    Messages:
    746
    Occupation:
    Retired Army
    Location:
    Missouri
    Thank you for the very humble and honest reply.

    I would think there needs to be very, very serious penalties for being out of compliance. In this country it would have to be mandatory jail time. And I'm not talking about 30 days, I'm talking about years.

    I'm not a statistician but I'm guessing we are in the top five countries of most heavily armed citizenry. We ain't givin that up easily. :)
     
  7. Willie B

    Willie B Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2016
    Messages:
    991
    Location:
    Mount Tabor VT
    Show statistics for Texas, or another big, sparsely populated state in the USA. In these places ordinary people carry guns. Nuts face opposition. I feel it is beneficial for every rational, skilled person to have a gun close. There are very few mass shootings in Texas. It isn't necessary to shoot anyone to use a gun to deter crime.
     
    old-iron-habit likes this.
  8. Willie B

    Willie B Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2016
    Messages:
    991
    Location:
    Mount Tabor VT
    Vermont, a state in the USA is in the throes of transition. Once we might have been considered the most conservative state of 50. Now, the people cave changed only a small bit, but politically we are now the most liberal state. Change comes fast! A few populous communities have become almost totally peopled by ultra liberal activists. We were the first to allow something interchangeable with marriage to homosexuals, we circumvented other states legalizing marijuana, we gave it out to anyone who ever had anything worse than a cold. Our Lieutenant Governor is a marijuana farmer selling his crop to the state!

    VT laws will change soon. Meanwhile plenty of people carry a firearm. Others conceal carry. Some, like me, are never far from a gun. Thus far we haven't had a mass shooting. Friends from Massachusetts have a vacation home here. They worry about violence from strangers. I explain that few Vermonters have ever been shot by strangers. VT has murders, almost always by a spouse, occasionally a drug deal gone bad. In VT strangers don't kill strangers.

    I believe guns serve as a deterrent. If Bob shoots Jim, Bill might shoot Bob, or Jim might be armed, and shoot back. The uncertainty of who is armed suppresses the urge to shoot. Those prone to climbing a clock tower to kill might become targets themselves before they are prepared.

    Willie
     
  9. old-iron-habit

    old-iron-habit Senior Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2012
    Messages:
    2,954
    Occupation:
    Retired Cons't. Supt./Hospitals
    Location:
    Moose Lake, MN
    If our court system locked up criminals and made them serve a real penalty instead of coddling the b*stards we most likely wouldn't have to carry. Our low populated pristine area with no meaningful voting population was rewarded with both a maximum security sex offender facility and a medium security prison located only two miles from me and a mile from down town. Scum, both lawyers and crooks, are in town all the time visiting their cohorts in prison. Practicing self defense is only a pocket away for a lot of folks here.
     
    DMiller likes this.
  10. Willie B

    Willie B Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2016
    Messages:
    991
    Location:
    Mount Tabor VT
    Sadly, our prisons aren't really a deterrent to the people we send there. It's pretty rare for anyone to go to prison anyway. Shooting perpetrators of severe crimes, and leaving the body there, or shoving it to where it won't be in the way, and leaving it would be a deterrent. We have sent the message to criminals that we will be very lenient if, in the unlikely case that you are convicted, oh, you will be given the best defence attorney possible, and the judge will be ultra liberal.