RedlineDrainage
Active Member
Any input on a d8K? We like the idea of available parts and the fact they are simpler to work on than new dozers that are all electronic.
Grandpa, maybe you're right. All my experience is in the 24/7/365 world of mining and in that world the D8K was definitely not the best thing since sliced bread, it was right on the edge reliability-wise. We were very concerned when the D8L came out but after the first time I ran one I turned to my boss and said "pension all our 8K's off right now and get a fleet of these" ........ we did, and never looked back. I suppose before chiming in with my 2c I should have asled the OP what work he was planning on doing with the tractor. Quite frankly if anoyne wanted to stay away from electronic machines I'd "upgrade" and go for either an 8N or a 9N and have the benefit of the high-drive without all the electronics.Boy Nige, I usually agree with you, but I have an ol 8k and its been running along for 25 years now with regular servicing,,, the only parts have been cutting edge's and tracks.... how could you ever beat that? But then again I bought a D6c new... s/n 12511 and the only work I had to do to it is replace a worn out radiator.... Cat prolly overbuilt their machines in that era....
Don't really agree with that. The 8L was the official replacement for the 8K. The 9L was the replacement for the 9H. Only after they were on the market did Cat realise the "horsepower hole" they'd left in between the 7F and the 8L. They fixed that later by bringing in the 8N and "upgrading" the 8L, 9L, & 10 to 9N, 10N, and 11N respectively.Really not fair to compare the 8L to an 8K when the 8L was a detuned 9 with an 8 sticker on the tank
None whatsoever. A "complete electronics-free zone", both of them........Yair . . . Hey fellers, did any of the early high-tracks come out with "conventional" clutch/brake steering . . . and Nige when you say the 8N and 9N have "no electronics" does that go for the engine as well?
Cheers.