• Thank you for visiting HeavyEquipmentForums.com! Our objective is to provide industry professionals a place to gather to exchange questions, answers and ideas. We welcome you to register using the "Register" icon at the top of the page. We'd appreciate any help you can offer in spreading the word of our new site. The more members that join, the bigger resource for all to enjoy. Thank you!

Cost of moving dirt...

crazycajun

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 13, 2007
Messages
174
Location
louisiana
yeah, i am building 9 miles of levee's on his hunting lease. he wants to finsih that then we'll talk he said. lol basically he's kinda holding it over my head to get things done his way.. but if it works out it'l be worth it..
 

crazycajun

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 13, 2007
Messages
174
Location
louisiana
yeah i looked at it some, i need to go back and see if i could hold my salesman accountable for the numbers
 

mitchell2905

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 10, 2007
Messages
60
Location
Southern Indiana
Occupation
Mining parts specialist
The way we move our top soil at the coal mine I am employed at (and all of the other local mines) is with 35 CAT Challenger Agriculture Tractors, each equipped with two 18 cubic yard dirtpans. The rubber track Challengers should get good traction in the sand and loose soil. We often run ours in soft silt/sand overburden, and even in the mud when it rains. These units are the CHEAPEST way to move dirt! Trust me, I am a Mining Engineer student in college and have done many complicated math problems involving stripping/overburden removal, and the Ag tractors always win. You can have 4 Tractors for the same cost of 1 construction scraper.
 

surfer-joe

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 25, 2007
Messages
1,403
Location
Arizona
So Mitchell, you're saying that using 35 Challengers, with 35 operators, is total cost per yard cheaper than using, say, 18 push-pull 637's with only 18 operators?

This is interesting, but more to the point, can you share with us your calculations? Is there a point in distance where the big scrapers are better? Would 657 push-pulls pencil out worse, or better? Realizing the cost new per unit is immensely in favor of the smaller tractors and scrapers, how about long term maintenance on the small rigs? How well do the under-carriages hold up? Would the International Quadra-Tracs be better both operationally and cost wise? Have you tried the Deere tractors? How about wheeled tractors? You mentioned working in muddy and soft conditions.

This ties in with the labor aspect. What are your tractor hands getting paid? Is yours a UMW operation? I'm presuming the benefit package is good.

For many years the assumption has always been in dirt moving that bigger is better and more cost effective, particularly if you can cut the cost of labor by eliminating operators and support personnel. Not being a math whiz myself, I've often wondered if, these days, that with the sheer cost of earthmoving machinery, like scrapers, if having more of the smaller machines with more operators wouldn't be better from a cost standpoint.

I think too, of the impact on the local economy and community of having more skilled jobs available, thus spreading the wealth being generated around more evenly and offering some employment future to younger people. I'm familiar with the coal operations in the Illinois and Indiana areas, and I worked the strip mines in Kentucky and West Virginia. I looked into a fleet manager position at the Aryshire mine in Indiana a long time ago. They were using the giant draglines and a huge fleet of 637's to move the overburden and also perform reclamation.

Which begs another question, is your mine using the small tractors and drag scrapers for reclamation work? Do you have conventional scrapers as well? How about dozers? Do you see an increased need for dozers, or decreased? Can you use smaller dozers (D6, D7-D8) with your spread, or larger? (D10-D11) How about rubber-tired dozers?

Speaking of maintenance, how does that tie in? Does your mine need more or less maintenance personnel such as mechanics and fuelers and oilers?

I look forward to your reply.
 

mitchell2905

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 10, 2007
Messages
60
Location
Southern Indiana
Occupation
Mining parts specialist
Our mine is not union and our operators are only making $13/hr. The entire idea behind our operation is to be able to pack up and leave as soon as the mine is done (I think it has a 5 year life 3 years are already used up). So the biggest equipment we have is D-11s and 992s. The owner never really looks into long term costs, just initial purchase costs, but I believe that would still be in favor of the Ag tractors due to the price of the larger tires on the construction scrapers. All the equipment has its fair share of problems big or small. The Challengers are fairly easy to fix, and we are only 20 miles from a CAT dealership. The undercharrages hold up well, and we replace tracks about once a year( aftermarket belts, not cat). We run the small rubber guide wheels down to the metal. The biggest problem we accouter with the units is the pins that go through the hitches ofter break in half. As far as the setup, the tractors remove the first 8 feet of top soil, then from there down to the solid rock the clay is full of large rocks and boulders which the 992s dig out and load into 777s. What amazes me is that last week the 992s started digging topsoil, loading it onto the 777s, and they are making a massive stockpile at the far end for the tractors to pick up there, I guess it was because the tractors had too far of haul distance, but still I was always tought that handling material more than once increases cost drastically.
 

crazycajun

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 13, 2007
Messages
174
Location
louisiana
the problem comes when trying to dump into the water. i would take a hell of a dozer to push 10,000 yards a day
 

BrianHay

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2007
Messages
514
Location
Nanaimo B.C
last summer I was on a project with 4 637's hauling to a jd 850 pushing pad. We were long hauling but still getting around 100 loads a day each...he kept up to us for the most part.
 

BrianHay

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2007
Messages
514
Location
Nanaimo B.C
Hey Mitchell have you got some pictures of that operation?

How often do you guys have to handle the material twice? In hind site maybe self propelled scrapers would have been worth it to eliminate that? were the trucks catching up with the scrapers? Maybe thats why they started hauling topsoil.
 

mitchell2905

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 10, 2007
Messages
60
Location
Southern Indiana
Occupation
Mining parts specialist
We just now started handeling the material twice on monday. It boggles my mind why they are doing it that way.:pointhead I will try to get some pics next week.
 

RollOver Pete

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 5, 2007
Messages
1,510
Location
Indio, Ca
Occupation
Operating Engineer/mechanic
In a perfect world, you move dirt one time.
Seldom does that happen. I've been on jobs where we all but wore the dirt out. Thats where extras come in. That, or you work for t&m.
Also, the person doing the bidding had better be up on his game. It takes a sharp pencil to make money today.

That said, one job I was recently on in Rancho Bernardo, Ca. involved me top loading bottom dumps with a Cat 345 excavator, a Cat D10N ripping and pushing to me and a D6R cleaning up behind us. This was a tight job in that there was little or no room to stockpile material from the sub-ex. The average cut to sub grade was 10-15'. I loaded 30.000 yards of dirt which went to an off site location to be stockpiled. The average trip took from 1/2 hr to well over an hr., depending on traffic. I'm not sure what they used at the dump site to knock down, but there is a 4th piece and twice the dirt has been moved. About 10.000 yards will be brought back in after the lower floors of the structure are up. Thats 4 times that same dirt has been handled.

Every job has its own unique set of problems. Thats why the estimator better know all there is to know about the geology and makeup of the ground he is bidding on.... especially if he's bidding on work away from conditions that he's used to.
:cool2

http://www.youtube.com/Suffacated
 

fensoncont.

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2007
Messages
286
Location
Midwest
I really enjoyed reading this topic, very interesting. If I'm understanding this correctly it is 1400 square acres of an 8 ft. cut hauling 500-1000 ft.? If so that is a lot of dirt, any exact figure on the CY?
 

CM1995

Administrator
Joined
Jan 21, 2007
Messages
13,344
Location
Alabama
Occupation
Running what I brung and taking what I win
In a perfect world, you move dirt one time.
Seldom does that happen. I've been on jobs where we all but wore the dirt out. Thats where extras come in. That, or you work for t&m.
Also, the person doing the bidding had better be up on his game. It takes a sharp pencil to make money today.
Every job has its own unique set of problems. Thats why the estimator better know all there is to know about the geology and makeup of the ground he is bidding on.... especially if he's bidding on work away from conditions that he's used to.
:cool2

http://www.youtube.com/Suffacated

Pete- well said and very good advice. Knowing what kind of ground you are moving is essential. Of course there are rock clauses and the like for unseen conditions - but I am talking about that abrasive difficult to cut and difficult to grade material where no real solid rock is present.

In my neck of the woods the soil conditions can change dramatically within a few miles. We have rock in many different forms - the rippable type and the blasting type, but the most abrasive material we deal with is chert. Chert is an extremely abrasive mixture of clay (all types), quartz rock (from fist size to VW bug size) and on occasion sand seams. Very rarely do you have to blast, just dig the larger boulders out and hit it with a hammer - the quartz is very brittle and it breaks easily - most of the time.:rolleyes: This material is so abrasive that it will wear a set of heavy duty tips down to the shank on a 325 out in one day of truck loading - no exaggeration. We wore the pads out on a D6N in 250HRS.

The point to my rambling is echoing what Pete said. The geological conditions of a site have the ability to make or break your profit. I always take a hoe out to any site I am either looking at buying or bidding on and make several test pits - sometimes I bring my geotech out to look at it as well. The best recon is deep test bores but sometimes that is not a luxury. Of course the best estimate is experience working in the type of material you will be moving.

Pete BTW - Great video!:drinkup
 

RollOver Pete

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 5, 2007
Messages
1,510
Location
Indio, Ca
Occupation
Operating Engineer/mechanic
Thanks Cory...:drinkup
Glad ya liked them.
When you spend as much time as I do working away from home , being stuck in a motel provides me the perfect opportunity to get my creative juices flowing.:popcorn

And it also keeps me out of trouble...:exactly
:cool2
 
Top