John C.
Senior Member
I got this in a news feed today and thought many of you might think it interesting. It is very vague as to what Caterpillar was being charged with and why the IRS went after the corporation.
https://www.equipmentworld.com/busi...t_id=bf38e48244bcf0b7a6e54d35a7e056326d5b1b7f
I was an employee of a Cat dealer at the time and the gist of what we were told about the situation goes something like this. Parts were obtained through manufacture or purchase and stored in the United States. This incurs some sort of inventory tax normally, but Caterpillar listed the parts as being part of one of their subsidiaries based in another country, Sweden or Switzerland as I recall, so incurred no tax liability in their eyes. Apparently the scheme was exposed by a whistleblower in a different court case which brought in the IRS. William Bar was the attorney for Caterpillar at the time and then became the Attorney General where the case faded into the background and I thought went away politically. Apparently it had not completely disappeared as shown by the article. The case was settled with no determination of guilt, no fines and no repercussions to any individual that was part of the scheme.
https://www.equipmentworld.com/busi...t_id=bf38e48244bcf0b7a6e54d35a7e056326d5b1b7f
I was an employee of a Cat dealer at the time and the gist of what we were told about the situation goes something like this. Parts were obtained through manufacture or purchase and stored in the United States. This incurs some sort of inventory tax normally, but Caterpillar listed the parts as being part of one of their subsidiaries based in another country, Sweden or Switzerland as I recall, so incurred no tax liability in their eyes. Apparently the scheme was exposed by a whistleblower in a different court case which brought in the IRS. William Bar was the attorney for Caterpillar at the time and then became the Attorney General where the case faded into the background and I thought went away politically. Apparently it had not completely disappeared as shown by the article. The case was settled with no determination of guilt, no fines and no repercussions to any individual that was part of the scheme.