• Thank you for visiting HeavyEquipmentForums.com! Our objective is to provide industry professionals a place to gather to exchange questions, answers and ideas. We welcome you to register using the "Register" icon at the top of the page. We'd appreciate any help you can offer in spreading the word of our new site. The more members that join, the bigger resource for all to enjoy. Thank you!

What is the impact of the emison control devises on the engine compared to pre emission engine

lake side bob

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 2, 2009
Messages
252
Location
minnesota
Occupation
owner operator
Any one have knowledge of the effect of the emission control devises on today's new equipment compared to old pre-emission engines.
Question is does the emission control devises consume HP from engine to perform work so the manufactures have increased HP of the engine in the machine to compensate for emission control engine HP loss?
Years ago a D3 dozer or now D1 was at 70 HP now its 80 HP
a CAT 120 excavator was 84 HP now its CAT 313 108 HP
yes the weigh have gone up a few thousand pounds also.
I am thinking these emission control devises rob engine HP so the manuf. have had to increase engine HP to make up the difference of the lost power.
 

Birken Vogt

Charter Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2003
Messages
5,320
Location
Grass Valley, Ca
Horsepower is measured at the shaft of the engine or somewhere further back.

If any inefficiencies occur because of emissions garbage, they are internal to the engine and HP is HP at the shaft, the ability to do work in a set amount of time.

The engines may burn a bit more fuel to achieve the same HP, but in general, horsepower just creeps upward in any model year over year as a marketing technique, until they have to re-number everything a la Cat.
 

Coaldust

Senior Member
Joined
May 9, 2011
Messages
3,342
Location
North of the 60
Occupation
Cargo Tanks, ULSD, RUG, Methanol, LPG
Lake Side Bob,

From a maintenance standpoint, we see an increase in upper cylinder liner wear and piston ring wear on post-emission engines, caused by EGR. The soot in the exhaust gas is very abrasive.

EGR increases the soot loading of the lube oil. Cummins Engine Co. states. “Soot can cause wear in highly loaded components in an engine, such as fuel injector adjuster screws, push-rod ball ends, valve-train, tappets, etc.“

Dealing with soot, engine oil service intervals have decreased.

Another phenomena has appeared in fuel systems. Cylinder head temps are jacked-up, creating a condition where the return fuel to the tank is hot enough to scorch the diesel and create asphaltenes which plug your fuel filters. People mistake it for bio-contamination or bad fuel.

Of course, there is massive amounts of money spent trying to keep the exhaust after- treatment system working.

Tracking costs, my post-2011 trucks (outside of warranty) average $25,000 a year for after-treatment repair. But, Warranty is sketchy because my fleet idles excessively, which voids the warranty.

Pre-2011 trucks average about $400 per year for exhaust system repair.
 

lantraxco

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2009
Messages
7,704
Location
Elsewhen
In my opinion only, on the off road side Tier 2 and Tier 3 both made the engines more efficient, burning less fuel and rejecting less heat per horsepower hour. They should have quit right there. Tier 4(i) was such a huge disaster that should never have happened, and including the equivalent on road bankrupted a lot of small companies. Tier 4 final and whatever comes next (God help us!) is a huge money maker for the manufacturers in replacement parts and engine overhauls/replacements. Dodge I think has what, a 36,000 mile warranty on emissions? Why are we buying them? Just nuts.
 

Coaldust

Senior Member
Joined
May 9, 2011
Messages
3,342
Location
North of the 60
Occupation
Cargo Tanks, ULSD, RUG, Methanol, LPG
I think 2002-2004 was the pinnacle of Diesel engine design. We could still build 2.5 gram engines. Plus, the manufacturers had developed some very efficient high pressure fuel systems. Most of the design bugs had been worked out.

How many of you distinguished gentlemen remember the infamous Consent Decree between the EPA and the domestic truck engine manufacturers? That was a pivotal point to the industry.

Just a few years earlier, Caterpillar had achieved a TE of 46% with the 3176. That was incredible. Today, Diesel engine thermal efficiency is back down to the low 3o% numbers.

Marketers boast about how clean Diesel engines are today, but fail to mention how inefficient modern engines are. It takes much more fuel to make them “clean”.
 

Coaldust

Senior Member
Joined
May 9, 2011
Messages
3,342
Location
North of the 60
Occupation
Cargo Tanks, ULSD, RUG, Methanol, LPG
Does anyone remember when we could take a 3406E, change a couple water pumps, roll some bearings in at 500,000 miles, replace injectors and go 1 million miles?

We can’t go 250k miles with a X-15 between majors. And, probably have to scrap the block anyways.
 

Coaldust

Senior Member
Joined
May 9, 2011
Messages
3,342
Location
North of the 60
Occupation
Cargo Tanks, ULSD, RUG, Methanol, LPG
AzIron,

A good driver and good maintenance could make those go a long time. I remember the Truck Engine publication when Cat announced the 500,000 mile bearing roll-in was not required anymore.
That was incredible. A million miles on bearings.
 

Tones

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 15, 2009
Messages
3,078
Location
Ubique
Occupation
Ex land clearing contractor, part-time retired
Blokes on another forum have found by removing all the Teir 4 crap of the 3.9 litre Cummins engine they are getting over a gallon an hour in fuel savings, engine running cooler even they boosted the hp from 120 to 140.
Stan Goodman on the scraper forum here runs Wabco 353's and new Cat 657's. He stated that the 50 year old Wabcos do the same number of loads, burn the same amount of fuel as the Cats but correct me if I'm wrong carry 16 cu yds more. So if somebody were to calculate emissions on material moved!!!
 

Coaldust

Senior Member
Joined
May 9, 2011
Messages
3,342
Location
North of the 60
Occupation
Cargo Tanks, ULSD, RUG, Methanol, LPG
Talking about the effect of post-emission engines, Its incredible what has happened to engine oil. Just the money that has been spent engineering all new additive packages. It’s more about trying to get the oil additives to work with the after-treatment and not so much about wear. Except, the new additive packages do address the soot loading. But, I’m still skeptical about CK-4 and FA-4 oils. Long term results will be interesting.
 

AzIron

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 14, 2016
Messages
1,547
Location
Az
I have a newer 310 slhl backhoe 110hp I have an old 416c backhoe at about 68hp the 416 burns half the fuel a day and gets a little less production but it is also 2500 lbs lighter as well witch is were a big portion of the demand for power comes into play

The 416 is a much simpler design than the 310 and in most applications the 310 does not out class the 416 mainly at loading trucks or in rock on the side of a hill hanging on a slope otherwise the 416 is a much cheaper machine to operate
 

terex herder

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 10, 2017
Messages
1,802
Location
Kansas
Engine displacement had to go up to compensate for the lower RPM limit for emissions. Many hydrostat driven machines had to go to larger pumps to get the same flow as the older machines with higher RPM limits.
 

Coaldust

Senior Member
Joined
May 9, 2011
Messages
3,342
Location
North of the 60
Occupation
Cargo Tanks, ULSD, RUG, Methanol, LPG
Good point about increased displacements. The 2007 jump to 1.2 gram was a struggle for the manufacturers. Those “bridge” engines were a disaster. What a dark time.

Not a fan boi of Navistar, But I enjoyed and was entertained by their no EGR stance and advertising of that era. Oh’ and Cat. Cat said, “ We ain’t using EGR!. We have CGI!”. Cold Gas Induction. Lol.

Then Cat be like, “Screw it!” “We ain’t playing the truck engine game no more.”
 
Last edited:

Tones

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 15, 2009
Messages
3,078
Location
Ubique
Occupation
Ex land clearing contractor, part-time retired
But terex herder I have watched excavator engines getting smaller yet putting out more hp. For instance 40 years ago Hitachi EX200 ran a 6.2 litre engine rated at 93 hp. Today their 12 ton machines run at 135hp on a lot smaller engine than was used back in the day. What I don't see is the productivity gains or longevity.
 

funwithfuel

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2017
Messages
5,567
Location
Will county Illinois
Occupation
Mechanic
You guys brought up a sore subject. My experience is that displacement was increased to offset intake and exhaust load as well as parasitic drains such as high pressure pumps. Tier II was about as good as it gets. We had compression still, electronic fuel injection HPCR had just been introduced. The big 3 had their big bores putting millions of miles on American roads. DD series60 , the Cat 3406E and my favorite Cummins N14 Celect. I-H had the HEUIs for mid range. At the time ICP was maybe 2200-2500 psi. The manufacturers had reduced PM very low, but the goal post was moved. Now it had to be reduced further , oh and reduce NOx too. So now we're into EGRs and some DOCs for on highway. ( garbage trucks burning to the ground, remember that? )
That was short term. Particle traps are the next step, oh, while you're at it, reduce the noise from the inlet as well. Introduce panel filters and all those strange air cleaner designs. Now we have EGR and reduced flow capacity coming and going. Just to reduce NOx they knocked the compression ratios way down and introduced "cooled EGR" This reduced ignition efficiency so now the DPF is working hard trapping all that soot. Soot is being suspended in the oil and zinc is gone. Now we need to regenerate the DPF, some have burners to achieve heat, others use a 7th injector and others run in cylinder post injection. It doesn't matter which boondoggle it is, it's wasted fuel. Fuel used for something other than work. Now they realize that emissions require heat to work properly. You can't reduce soot to ash at idle. Now we get our compression back, fuel pressure goes sky high, fuel filtration becomes the biggest challenge. 5 micron final pass filters are now common, injector longevity is out the door. Higher heat , higher compression shows that current metallurgy is insufficient. Blocks show erosion, heads dance on the deck. EGR coolers are failing regularly. Coolant additives packages are pushed to their limits. Exhaust temps in manifold are nearing 650°F under load without dosing fuel for after treatment. Thermostat opening temps are climbing higher. 195° t-stat are common. So now combustion efficiency is up, we've got compression, temperature and metallurgy is creeping up. NOx is still too high, now we gotta add DEF to the exhaust steam to make sunshine and rainbows. Here's the plus of DEF injection. Some machines can forego EGR, not have it and address NOx strictly in the tailpipe.
The horsepower draw was really evident to anyone who performed a delete or perfmed a conversion in 3rd world countries. An A40D haul truck had a 13 liter engine, in the subsequent generations of emissions F & G they had to up displacement to 16. To be clear, a D13C is no slouch. Last I heard, they're running D16H engines. Through Ritchie bros, 3rd world countries could buy American used equipment, get a voucher so that once received at the dock, the dealer would remove all emissions equipment and reflash the computers. They get all the power and efficiency of a modern diesel without the emissions hassle.
I have watched over the last 20 years as this BS has crushed Mom n Pop outfits who didn't have the resources to survive the first breakdown post warranty. A machine that's otherwise fully functioning, derating, creeping at idle because a thousand dollar sensor decides it wants to be out of range. All dictated by foreign treaty and enforced by the EPA. Phooey
 

Birken Vogt

Charter Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2003
Messages
5,320
Location
Grass Valley, Ca
Well, the EPA doesn’t have to take into consideration costs and jobs losses for the laws they implement. It’s do what they say or get out of the business.

Just to be clear, these are not laws. They are hundreds of pages of rules and regulations published by bureaucrats on a daily basis that could be just as easily repealed the next day if they wanted to. But year after year it just keeps creeping up, nay, galloping along and nobody does anything about it.
 
Top