oceanobob
Senior Member
Have been investigating the method to have a thumb on the Service Port hydraulics on a Kubota mini (U17). Service Port valve has no relief, no passage back to the sump when in neutral, no load check....just a valve that sends fluid to the load and allows a return flow to the sump. Works great for a hammer. Works OK for the tilt bucket cause the tilt bucket is built strong enough to tolerate the full system pressure.
Dont want a damaged/bent/cracked dipper, or, a bent thumb / bent ram when the thumb is overpowered by the bucket - and I learned a crossover relief isn't correct [as pointed out on this forum in other threads] 'cause the ram has a volume diff between the rod end and the cylinder end . That wisdom saved me from wasting time on that idea. Pilot operated relief is being invoked instead.
Also thinking about a pressure regulator to enable the thumb to have reduced clamping pressure to pick up wood posts and poles and not leave big marks. Regulator is pilot operated to allow adjustment from the seat.
The "hydraulic wizard engineer" has the drawing detailed and recently sent it to me with some hydraulic goodies etc but all the while we were thinking of a two way ram - 'cause that is what we see.
He is in NorCal and he sends me a pic of a medium sized JD steel track excavator with a single line going to the thumb's ram; our thinking is the bucket returns the ram to the stow position. He says this change from dual to single line ram will reduce the complexity of the hydraulics a great amount. He did mention the ram will be filled on both sides by the one hose and the ram force is equal to the rod area times the pressure. As opposed to the piston area. Likely this will make the motion quicker.
Any experience on or with this idea using a thumb such as this being described herein?
Dont want a damaged/bent/cracked dipper, or, a bent thumb / bent ram when the thumb is overpowered by the bucket - and I learned a crossover relief isn't correct [as pointed out on this forum in other threads] 'cause the ram has a volume diff between the rod end and the cylinder end . That wisdom saved me from wasting time on that idea. Pilot operated relief is being invoked instead.
Also thinking about a pressure regulator to enable the thumb to have reduced clamping pressure to pick up wood posts and poles and not leave big marks. Regulator is pilot operated to allow adjustment from the seat.
The "hydraulic wizard engineer" has the drawing detailed and recently sent it to me with some hydraulic goodies etc but all the while we were thinking of a two way ram - 'cause that is what we see.
He is in NorCal and he sends me a pic of a medium sized JD steel track excavator with a single line going to the thumb's ram; our thinking is the bucket returns the ram to the stow position. He says this change from dual to single line ram will reduce the complexity of the hydraulics a great amount. He did mention the ram will be filled on both sides by the one hose and the ram force is equal to the rod area times the pressure. As opposed to the piston area. Likely this will make the motion quicker.
Any experience on or with this idea using a thumb such as this being described herein?