413wedge
Active Member
Wouldn't that be dumping it back in the same hole?
Greg
i was just speaking to versatility . although i have gone 270 on my excavator working around a corner
Wouldn't that be dumping it back in the same hole?
Greg
I figured that was what you meant, it just struck me as funny. Didn't mean to derail the thread.
Greg
Only you really know what jobsite conditions you will encounter, and so it will be hard for others to give the best advice.
There is a lot to consider in this question. I used to live in Vta. Co. (like the OP reports) and started my business, back in '96, with a 416B. My primary work was foundation excavation for masonry, tilt-ups, and custom homes. I also did utility work. Some of the masonry work was garden wall footings (usually proto II) on tract homes. Tract homes in SoCal are usually 5' from P/L and I could still get the backhoe in there. I had a competitor that began using a mini for the same work. My backhoe could out produce the mini, hands down, despite the mini being more size appropriate for the conditions. Since I have moved I have changed my business model and now have a mini (Bobcat 435, [+/- 12,000# as equipped]), and a skid (Bobcat A300). I still have my 416 (now a C model with over 12,000 hours), along with other, larger equipment. The mini and the skid are a good combination but my backhoe will out dig the mini by a lot. In my opinion one would need a bigger machine (which would negate the small size advantages) to match production of the backhoe. The mini has a lot of advantages (full house rotation, plus swing separate from the house, track mounted, etc.) but if it's smaller than the 'hoe it will not have the same bucket capacity capability, or break out forces.
Only you really know what jobsite conditions you will encounter, and so it will be hard for others to give the best advice. From what I remember about my work in SoCal the mini/ctl combo would not have been the best combination, and definitely not 50% more productive. I certainly would not tell you not to make the investment though. I might recommend that you keep the backhoe though. That way you can have more versatility.
I can not find a dealer in the USA.
Might trade the Cat for one.
Any idea on the cost for one?
Word I got from a friend that inquired the factory was they were not looking to market in the Americas anytime soon. I like this machine though.
That machine would be ideal for site lighting and conduit. Trench all the conduit, drill the pole bases and set the light poles. There's good money in that.
All you have to do to bring one in I would think is make sure the engine meets current EPA regulations. If it's got a CE or EU emissions sticker that may be enough, along with a letter from the engine maker. Probably easier if it's declared as a used machine, but I won't swear to it.
Available in the States?
I can not find a dealer in the USA.
Might trade the Cat for one.
Any idea on the cost for one?
I'm resurrecting this old thread because I'd like to know if anyone has any experience with Mecalac machines? I have contacted Mecalac to determine if and when they may become available in the US market. For the projects I am now involved with installing dry underground utilities for power and communications distribution these machines would seem the ideal, adding the auger attachment and a small diameter grapple would even allow me to set street light poles. Having to transport and deal with one versatile machine per project would make logistics much easier and more economical since projects range all over Central and South Florida both coasts too. Clearly they're manufactured in and mostly used in Europe so I am seeking information from European members. Thank you in advance for any input...
View attachment 138302