• Thank you for visiting HeavyEquipmentForums.com! Our objective is to provide industry professionals a place to gather to exchange questions, answers and ideas. We welcome you to register using the "Register" icon at the top of the page. We'd appreciate any help you can offer in spreading the word of our new site. The more members that join, the bigger resource for all to enjoy. Thank you!

95 mack dm 688s project

CM1995

Administrator
Joined
Jan 21, 2007
Messages
13,373
Location
Alabama
Occupation
Running what I brung and taking what I win
Nice restoration! Hope that truck serves you well.
 

CM1995

Administrator
Joined
Jan 21, 2007
Messages
13,373
Location
Alabama
Occupation
Running what I brung and taking what I win
Looks great!

With the cost of new trucks as high as they are and the reliability being low, this is the best option to have a nice dependable truck.
 

Steve Frazier

Founder
Staff member
Joined
Oct 30, 2003
Messages
6,608
Location
LaGrangeville, N.Y.
Only thing better looking would be a "B" model, but cab is a bit cramped in those.

Those DM cabs were no bargain either. A little bit more room than a B but still plenty cramped compared to other brands. I drove one for 2 years, I'm 6'4". Most reliable truck I ever drove but probably the least comfortable. If I close my eyes I can still see the mirrors rattling at idle LOL!!

Nice job on this one ctkiteboarding!! Was converting the front axle to the Budd pattern simply a bolt on or was there more involved?
 

ctkiteboarding

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2007
Messages
386
Location
sw ct.
thanks steve. the hubs and drums needed to be swapped , not the cheapest conversion but it really brightens up the truck .
I have to agree these older macks are tight and barebones but i think its part of the working truck bloodline of mack, a "no frills" just work thing. I think its one of the things that makes them so reliable.
 

kshansen

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2012
Messages
11,162
Location
Central New York, USA
Occupation
Retired Mechanic in Stone Quarry
Those DM cabs were no bargain either. A little bit more room than a B but still plenty cramped compared to other brands.

True the seat would rub on the back of the cab and the steering wheel would almost be touching your ribs. Would like to see the guy who designed that cab, must have been a short little guy that had a 25 inch waist!
 

ctkiteboarding

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2007
Messages
386
Location
sw ct.
True the seat would rub on the back of the cab and the steering wheel would almost be touching your ribs. Would like to see the guy who designed that cab, must have been a short little guy that had a 25 inch waist!

its not for heavyweights that's for sure, the previous owner dropped a high back seat out of a pete in this one and it made it even tighter, I have a bostrum 914 mid back for it which should free up things abit.
 

Steve Frazier

Founder
Staff member
Joined
Oct 30, 2003
Messages
6,608
Location
LaGrangeville, N.Y.
I can remember now there was hardly room on the floor for both my lunch cooler and a water jug. One would fit but both made things snug. One thing I did like was the number of air vents in the cab. If you were on the move you hardly needed A/C, air came at you from all directions.
 
Top