• Thank you for visiting HeavyEquipmentForums.com! Our objective is to provide industry professionals a place to gather to exchange questions, answers and ideas. We welcome you to register using the "Register" icon at the top of the page. We'd appreciate any help you can offer in spreading the word of our new site. The more members that join, the bigger resource for all to enjoy. Thank you!

Tournadozer

stinkycat

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2009
Messages
224
Location
Ohio
Occupation
retired, disabled vet
Traveled to my Daughter's home in central Ohio and while there contacted Dpull about taking pictures of some of his equipment.
It was after some storms so it wasn't set-up for display. So I'll try to upload some pictures.DSCF0009-400.jpg
 

dpull

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2007
Messages
61
Location
Central Ohio
Occupation
Owner/Operator
Thanks StinkyCat for posting the picture. Hope when you get back this way next time I'll have things in better order. I located a steering brake and a rectifer so now its a matter of getting time to work on it.
Thanks,
dpull
 

LakeRat1

Member
Joined
Feb 10, 2012
Messages
22
Location
Louisiana
Occupation
Retired From: Farming, Oil Field Service Co., Serv
That Brings Back the Years to Me,Back in My Younger Years i was in the US Army, went to Heavy Equp. School in Ft. Lenordwood Mo. & as far as i cam remember not a word was said about the Tournadozer ( we called them TDs ) any way i was shipped to france in early 1962, and the Company that is was in had 8 of them, they didnt have a Blade on them. we were pulling pans, i think they were 18 yd. pans, on the front was a big bush block, we were working on a site for a railroad going from a French RR to a Ammo Dump, it was about 15 or so miles, there was another Hea vy Eguipment Co. that had some TDs but there units had Blades on them, they also were pulling pans, But there was a little difference in the gearing of the ones with Blades & the ones we were Operating, our TDs were a littler faster in all 4 gears, it might have been because of the Blades, they may have been Geared Lower, Dont know, they all had 671 Jimmys, One of the things that i will never forget was how good of a seat they had, these things really set & rode good, even on very ruff ground, the biggest problem we had with the were the Brakes, the were some sort of disk brake, the Air bladder would get stiff from the heat & Crack, once that happen it was hard to keep the air pressure up, same for the 4 gears, the clutch packs out front worked with a bunch of disk some drive & some driven, the rubber bladder that applied the pressure would crack and the same problem, everthing about the control was operated by air, the winches were Elect, You 2 block it when oper. a pan & it could snap a cable with the blink of your eye, They were a Very Noise Rig to run, guess that has something to do with i cant hear nothing today,

Thanks For Posting the Picture, I have a couple pic. of them from the Army days, but i have never figured out how to post a pic

LakeRat1
 
Top