• Thank you for visiting HeavyEquipmentForums.com! Our objective is to provide industry professionals a place to gather to exchange questions, answers and ideas. We welcome you to register using the "Register" icon at the top of the page. We'd appreciate any help you can offer in spreading the word of our new site. The more members that join, the bigger resource for all to enjoy. Thank you!

Track Tearing Problem

LuckyJ

Member
Joined
Apr 10, 2011
Messages
21
Location
Canada
Hello,

I was wondering if anyone has ever had problems tearing tracks on a track machine. We have a CAT 257B II and it doesn't seem to matter what type of tracks we have (CAT, after market, steel cores, kevlar), we keep tearing them. I know the undercarriage on the 257 has been known to be a bit light/underbuilt for the weight of the machine but is there something we are doing wrong? Are the tracks too tight? Is it operator abuse? How much "play" should there be in the track? We have replaced most of the idlers/rollers but that didnt help. The rips seem to mostly start on an outside edge and it doesnt take long before it's ripped to the middle. The last set of tracks did only a bit of snow removal and tore when working in sand. I would say they had under 1000 hours on them. Any ideas what might be going on?

Thanks in advance.
 

lgammon

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 26, 2007
Messages
303
Location
kingsport, tn
1000 hours ......this is about the life of these tracks. i get a bit more, an asphalt guy here can't get 600
 

heavylift

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2009
Messages
1,046
Location
KS
excessive spinning in place. turning in it own radius.. narrow bucket , get a bucket 6" wider than tracks. 1000 hours TOO many Operators. lifting front of machine off ground ( 2 wheel drive all the weight on the back wheel of the track)
I ran a 247, I was the only operator for most part 1900... then it was farmed out to everyone 1100 on the tracks. first set was cat original, don't know the brand of the second.. And I used it on every surface there is
 

LuckyJ

Member
Joined
Apr 10, 2011
Messages
21
Location
Canada
What about having the tracks "too tight"? How much play should their be. I heard if I press down on the top of the track, it should move about 1/2" to 3/4". Any thoughts on this?
 

LuckyJ

Member
Joined
Apr 10, 2011
Messages
21
Location
Canada
I'm thinking it's the "turning on a dime" part as we constantly check the tightness and have also replaced other components of the undercarriage. Disappointing none the less. May have to look at a different size/brand next time.
 

WV earth mover

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2011
Messages
110
Location
WV
90 lb of force shouldnt cause more than 1 '' of sag halfway from the sprocket to the front idler . 1000 hrs from what ive seen is good for any type of rubber track design. The steel cable style found on others may not be as torn after 1000 hrs but they will most likely be completly bald like the T 300 i ran last week that had the sprocket teeth sticking through the track that how much rubber was gone, it had 1100 hrs.
 

zfrepair

Active Member
Joined
Apr 7, 2011
Messages
25
Location
pa
if you like the cat machines the new ones have the good designed tracks
 

cat943

Active Member
Joined
Jan 30, 2010
Messages
29
Location
melbounre aus
Occupation
loader and excavator operator
By luckyJ first post his machine is a 257b series 2 and than along with the series 3 has the different sprocket drive that is found on the 257 and 257b machines.
So luckyJ’s machine is the current design so getting a newer machine may not solve the problem that the 257 seams to suffer from…

One thing luckyj forgot to mention is it both or only one track that is ripping?

As for the track design I think it would have been better if the 257 had the track system that the terex pt70 has as the weight of both machines is about the same and would suit the 257 better

Looking at both the 257 and 247 I would say (only because I own one) the 247 is a far better machine than the 257 and more suited to the track system the 257 is just over half a ton heaver than the pt 60 witch uses the same track system.

The only changes between asv/terex and cat in the series 2 n 3 is the sprocket drive set up as for the rest of it its all the same system.
 

heavylift

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2009
Messages
1,046
Location
KS
concrete work is a killer on tracks in your guys don't care..

247 is the best little ctl in my opinion.

fast but fuel hungry, fuel tank too small. I like the suspension smoother ride
we had a 247 and 257 and the weight plus same engine size really slows the 257 down, enough that it is lappable :), I used to make the 257 operator mad because I kept telling him he was slow..
 

zfrepair

Active Member
Joined
Apr 7, 2011
Messages
25
Location
pa
that undercarriage was designed for snow and dont last in dirt thats why cat uses a complete differant system now
 

BZ1

Member
Joined
May 18, 2011
Messages
6
Location
MN
Sorry for off topic but am new to forum and have some questions and can't find answers. Does anyone know how long new members have to wait before I can start a new thread? I just bought a used ASV 4500 and have some questions for smart people out there, track and undercarriage related. Sure like to start a thread on several topics.
 

Bubba

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 20, 2010
Messages
107
Location
Lagrange Georgia
Occupation
Locomotive Engineer, Property Management, Clearing
In my opinion you got to think about a rubber band when considering rubber tracks. "The more you stretch the rubber band the MORE stress is on it" therefore keep the least amount of pressure off the tracks that you can allow for the type of work application. When clearing you may need it tighter to prevent throwing a track than on a hard surface su h as loading trucks or operating on asphalt /concrete. Watch your operators and don't let him be a hotdog or showoff. It only will cost you excessive wear and TEAR.
 
Last edited:

Haddy

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 6, 2011
Messages
146
Location
Atiamuri New Zealand
Occupation
earthmoving contractor
Not Cat but VTS

We have had a set of VTS tracks fitted to a Mustang 2109 ( 100 hp ) . One of the tracks broke after 500 hours , from what I could see it broke from the middle out , the wire was as rusty as #$%k . The rubber hardly worn at all , and they told us we had been too hard on them and using it on too harsh material , then they said that the machine had too much HP but they were the ones who spec'ed it . at the end of the day I think they were just BullS***ing us . One operator on this machine who I would consider a good , smooth operator and works in what I would think is good material . I would consider that the tracks had the correct tension on them any time I seen it and I work along side of it most of the time . Has any one else had simliar problem ? Haddy
 
Top