aglasergps
Active Member
- Joined
- Jul 7, 2008
- Messages
- 36
- Location
- Yatala, Queensland, Australia
- Occupation
- Managing Director - TOOMEY EARTHMOVERS
GPS simply isn't as accurate as a laser. That's why laser augmentation for GPS exists. I don't know much about trenching but I've laid a lot of pipe... for anything pressurized GPS works good, but for drainage pipes GPS is a no-no.
When I was surveyor for an engineering company we'd check grade for waterline and dirt work with GPS, but for setting blue tops for a concrete pavement or staking/checking drainage pipe... The old rod and level is still the best.
This really all depends on your acceptable tollerances for "accuracy".
In my mobile field drainage and grading applications the Trimble Ag RTK GNSS I use is more stable and way more repeatable than any laser transmitter, especially when distance becomes involved and I've been using lasers since 1979. In short distance applications (less than 200 meters) I'll agree with the laser statement but anything over that, lasers are too prone to all sorts of environmental influences (dust, wind, heat shimmer, fog, humidity, temperature inversions etc.). With my GNSS I have graded sand profiles over 5 km of track at down to +/- 5 mm (1/4 inch) with next to no additional control assistance apart from the original Bench Mark set up - try that sort of machine control with laser or total station.
It would also be successfully argued that static vertical accuracy with a satellite based solution can be a little bit variable and most guys using GPS for elevations would know that. Mind you, get a laser at a fair distance and you'd see more variation with that than you'd see from the GPS most times.
.