• Thank you for visiting HeavyEquipmentForums.com! Our objective is to provide industry professionals a place to gather to exchange questions, answers and ideas. We welcome you to register using the "Register" icon at the top of the page. We'd appreciate any help you can offer in spreading the word of our new site. The more members that join, the bigger resource for all to enjoy. Thank you!

Wrecking Ball vs High Reach **video**

EarthRockHill

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 10, 2009
Messages
136
Location
Detroit, MI
Occupation
Industrial Photographer
In August of 2009 I photographed the demolition of a pair of cold storage warehouses in Lowell, MA for Testa Corp. They were originally going to be demolished with a wrecking ball swung from their 1971 HC238 Link Belt Truck Crane. When concern arose regarding the proximity of one of the buildings to neighbors on the right and powerlines to the rear they decided to bring their 2008 Komatsu 1250 PC with a Jewell High Reach and LaBounty Shear in as well.

Although separate buildings, constructed two different ways, they shared the same footprint on the site.

As machines and attachments arrived it became apparent that there would be a showdown of old school versus modern technology, The Wrecking Ball vs The High Reach.

YouTube - Wrecking Ball vs. High Reach
 

ddigger

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 19, 2009
Messages
567
Location
Northern California
Occupation
contractor,owner operater
Very cool thanks for sharing. There have been many times I have either swung or dropped wrecking balls with my excavator, very effective!
 

EarthRockHill

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 10, 2009
Messages
136
Location
Detroit, MI
Occupation
Industrial Photographer
Very cool thanks for sharing. There have been many times I have either swung or dropped wrecking balls with my excavator, very effective!


I have 2 votes for the Link Belt and 1 vote for the High Reach..... what do you guys think?
 

mikef87

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2007
Messages
433
Location
waltham
Occupation
owner/operator/mechanic/laborer/truck driver
I'd say the ball looks more effective but for finesse work the high reach would probably be your best bet.
 

Cat is ALL

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 1, 2008
Messages
88
Location
Canada
High reach was quite a bit a cleaner, I imagine quite a bit cheaper as well. (I thought crane operators got the good wages)
 

Demo_Andy

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 20, 2008
Messages
61
Location
England
Occupation
Demolition Machine operator
My vote is for the high reach, slightly biased but.... the arguments for a high reach far outweigh that of the wrecking ball.

Good video btw Stephen, I like all your work.
 

Turbo21835

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 20, 2007
Messages
1,135
Location
Road Dog
High reach was quite a bit a cleaner, I imagine quite a bit cheaper as well. (I thought crane operators got the good wages)

Around here, demolition scale for an excavator operator is the same as a crane operator running less than 400 feet of boom.
 

JDOFMEMI

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2007
Messages
3,074
Location
SoCal
I like the way the comparison was made. Goes to show both ways are able to get the job done. To ask which is better is a matter of perspective.

Operators perspective: Komatsu is much more comfortable and less effort to run. Has to operate with a great deal of care to not damage the machine. Link belt is a workout to do this work with, but is pretty forgiving with minor mistakes.

Company owners perspective: Link Belt, paid for many times over, could be replaced inexpensively, but why, it was built to last. Komatsu, probably a $2 million investment, and it would be a surprise to see it in use productively 39 years from now.
 

Dozerboy

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2006
Messages
2,232
Location
TX
Occupation
Operator
Company owners perspective: Link Belt, paid for many times over, could be replaced inexpensively, but why, it was built to last. Komatsu, probably a $2 million investment, and it would be a surprise to see it in use productively 39 years from now.

Never though of it like that excellent point. Dang now I really need to learn to run a crane. Should of done it when I had the chance.
 

OneWelder

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 12, 2007
Messages
483
Location
Derry, New Hampshire
On the late news last week or week before they showed a brick building in Lowell they said was being demoed. - a worker was hurt by bricks blowing off one of the walls. Rescue people formed a human shield until they got him to safety
I am not a demo guy , but it struck me as odd the way they were doing it
Three brick walls probably 5 stories high, no roof, no floors, one end wall completely gone- also did not appear to have bracing of any kind
Just surprised they left the walls standing at that height with poor mortar - on building that was coming down
 

EarthRockHill

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 10, 2009
Messages
136
Location
Detroit, MI
Occupation
Industrial Photographer
On the late news last week or week before they showed a brick building in Lowell they said was being demoed. - a worker was hurt by bricks blowing off one of the walls. Rescue people formed a human shield until they got him to safety
I am not a demo guy , but it struck me as odd the way they were doing it
Three brick walls probably 5 stories high, no roof, no floors, one end wall completely gone- also did not appear to have bracing of any kind
Just surprised they left the walls standing at that height with poor mortar - on building that was coming down


That's because it was a construction site, not a demolition site in Lowell.

Totally unrelated to this job.

Its an old mill building that was gutted by fire decades ago that is being rebuilt as affordable housing units.

See attached story. Lowell Sun.com
 
Last edited:

Demo_Andy

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 20, 2008
Messages
61
Location
England
Occupation
Demolition Machine operator
I like the way the comparison was made. Goes to show both ways are able to get the job done. To ask which is better is a matter of perspective.

Operators perspective: Komatsu is much more comfortable and less effort to run. Has to operate with a great deal of care to not damage the machine. Link belt is a workout to do this work with, but is pretty forgiving with minor mistakes.

Company owners perspective: Link Belt, paid for many times over, could be replaced inexpensively, but why, it was built to last. Komatsu, probably a $2 million investment, and it would be a surprise to see it in use productively 39 years from now.

The komatsu might well be a $2 million dollar investment, but its well worth it to the company. Think of the multiple jobs this machine can do compared to the crane-

grab, dig, hammer, etc, etc.

The crane is pretty much a one trick pony, the komatsu is expensive but earns much more than that crane.

And high-reach resale is good.
 

JDOFMEMI

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2007
Messages
3,074
Location
SoCal
Andy

Don't get me wrong, I was not knocking the Komatsu, and it is a very versatile machine, but I was merely pointing out the long life of the simple method of the drop ball on a crane, versus the high cost of the new iron.

I do stand on the doubt that the Komatsu will still be in service in 39 years, unless it were to spend a great many of those years mothballed.
Is it still worth the high cost? It is as long as there is a need for the type of work it does.
 

heavytorching

Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2010
Messages
19
Location
michigan
Occupation
heavy torching/scrap steel processing
pretty cool,great video,if ya had a crusher on site you could make yer own 21aa and make even more$$
 

EarthRockHill

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 10, 2009
Messages
136
Location
Detroit, MI
Occupation
Industrial Photographer
pretty cool,great video,if ya had a crusher on site you could make yer own 21aa and make even more$$

Testa's Terex Crusher came in later in the process. Nothing is wasted. Everything is recycled and/or redistributed.

First the building was brought to the ground. While that happened rebar was systematically removed from columns and supports with a LaBounty muncher on a 345. Then concrete was crushed while the sub-basements were dug and hammered out.
 

oldtanker

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 25, 2010
Messages
463
Location
vining mn
Occupation
Ret
Pretty cool vid. I'll be the first to admit I know nothing of demo except the kind that comes out of the barrel of a tank cannon and what I learned in a demo (the kind that goes BOOM) course. I can see where both the crane and high reach have thier places. I just got an old JCB TLB yesterday. My first piece of construction equipment. So I'd say I'm about to learn things.

Rick
 

demolitiondave1

New Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2011
Messages
1
Location
England
A high reach is generally 50 - 100 ton machine. Not a great lot of general use on sites here in England for the larger machnes. 20 tonners are the norm, so I think a high reach would not be that versatile
 
Top