• Thank you for visiting HeavyEquipmentForums.com! Our objective is to provide industry professionals a place to gather to exchange questions, answers and ideas. We welcome you to register using the "Register" icon at the top of the page. We'd appreciate any help you can offer in spreading the word of our new site. The more members that join, the bigger resource for all to enjoy. Thank you!

Why is it so?

Digga Dave

Active Member
Joined
Dec 12, 2009
Messages
38
Location
Australia
Occupation
Senior operator - Local Government
At what point, I'm assuming is tied to weight, does a manufacturer decide to invert the boom rams and why? See pics below for examples.
345b FS Fisibach 090.jpg
5230-001%20(gro%DF).jpg
 

special tool

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2008
Messages
878
Location
Bethel, Ct.
I think we need a real engineer from Cat to answer this - or else we are gonna get a whole lotta speculatin' in this thread....:rolleyes:
 

John H

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 22, 2007
Messages
170
Location
Mass
Occupation
Arborist, Equipment operator
I don't know but I like the shiny side up.:beatsme
 

Dig-UP

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2007
Messages
87
Location
Upper Michigan
I think it has more to do with the location of the hoses. They are easier to plumb up if they are upside down... That is why most of the Liebherr machines are arranged like this.
 

watglen

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 3, 2009
Messages
1,324
Location
Dunnville, Ontario, Canada
Occupation
Farmer, drainage and excavating contractor, Farm d
Its got a lot to do with protecting the chrome too. Hoes with the traditional configuration put the rods at the top to help keep them away from debris as the bucket crowds toward the body.

I've never seen a 345 in a face shovel before, sweet!
 

AtlasRob

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 8, 2008
Messages
1,982
Location
West Sussex UK
Occupation
owner operator
The big one for it are the Germans. See Leibherr and original Atlas machines. The new Terex Atlas Machines have them the shiny side up. Maybe the Cat 5000 series inherited the idea with the technology. :beatsme
 

cummins05

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2009
Messages
430
Location
Edmonton
That 345 is a neat setup. I wonder how small cat or a aftermarket company will make a shovel
 

AtlasRob

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 8, 2008
Messages
1,982
Location
West Sussex UK
Occupation
owner operator
Its got a lot to do with protecting the chrome too. Hoes with the traditional configuration put the rods at the top to help keep them away from debris as the bucket crowds toward the body.

So should a bucket ram be tother way up? :stirthepot
 

cps

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 13, 2008
Messages
811
Location
Ireland
Occupation
plant mechanic
I think it has more to do with the location of the hoses. They are easier to plumb up if they are upside down... That is why most of the Liebherr machines are arranged like this.

Thats what i've also heard!, I think their was a thread on here somewhere suggesting this!
 

CAT793

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 1, 2008
Messages
141
Location
australia
I was always of the understanding that the reason was to do with Break Out force from the cylinders.
Depending on the Plumbing.............there is usually more surface area exposed to the Piston Head on the Barrel side just as there is reduced surface are on the Piston on the Rod End due to the Diameter of the Rod????

That is how it was explained to me by some one who I always trusted as being all knowing! Any other theories.................?
 

nzpatch

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2008
Messages
116
Location
new zealand
the piston vrs rod thing is what i thought for the most power but the piston is getting the oil nomater what way up the ram is up, isnt it???
 

360joe

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 2, 2008
Messages
47
Location
ireland
It's to facilitate the hydraulic hoses. The larger the hose diameter, the larger the bending radius on them and the more difficult they become to accomidate. Putting the chrome on the bottom does make it more vurnerable to damage but this is an acceptable compromise on the big quarry machines. This would not work on a 3 tonne machine in the rental market but I suppose the operator of a big face shovel is going to be trained and competent enough to look after his machine and avoid chrome damage.
It makes no difference at all to the force the cyclinder will develop. This is a function of the piston diameter and the hydraulic pressure only.
 

Chris5500

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2009
Messages
217
Location
Australia
Occupation
Plant Mechanic
I've had a bit too many to drink to explain the main reason (its alot more complicated than you think) but I'll try and get on in the morning before I start night shift :drinkup Theres a few reasons, but like I said, the main one is complicated!
 

360joe

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 2, 2008
Messages
47
Location
ireland
I am curious Chris. Dont take too long to reply. I was pretty sure easier fitting of the hoses is the main reason.
 

hvy 1ton

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 24, 2006
Messages
1,947
Location
Lawrence, KS
I was always of the understanding that the reason was to do with Break Out force from the cylinders.
Depending on the Plumbing.............there is usually more surface area exposed to the Piston Head on the Barrel side just as there is reduced surface are on the Piston on the Rod End due to the Diameter of the Rod????

That is how it was explained to me by some one who I always trusted as being all knowing! Any other theories.................?

That only applies when comparing the force and speed of a hydraulic cylinder pushing or pulling. A cylinder will always have more force pushing and more speed pulling because of the surface area (and volume) that is taken up by the rod. I would put my faith in the hose routing/bend radius being the deciding factor.
 
Top