• Thank you for visiting HeavyEquipmentForums.com! Our objective is to provide industry professionals a place to gather to exchange questions, answers and ideas. We welcome you to register using the "Register" icon at the top of the page. We'd appreciate any help you can offer in spreading the word of our new site. The more members that join, the bigger resource for all to enjoy. Thank you!

Ford in Fords not IH 2011

Dozerboy

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2006
Messages
2,232
Location
TX
Occupation
Operator
Ford now has a great auto trans now. GM had dropped there manual option in 06 I bet even dodge will eventually.
 

4x4_Welder

Member
Joined
Sep 7, 2009
Messages
21
Location
Rexburg, ID
If you maintain the engines properly and don't beat them like a rented mule, they last quite well. If you have an employee who uses the governor as a shift point or speed limiter, I don't care who made the engine, it'll have problems.

As far as the C6, I guess it was -the- transmission to swap in because it was so weak. I have seen them go over 400k in severe duty (stop and go in FL) without any work other than routine maintenance. Name me even a TH400 or TF727 that can touch that- Even the GM Allison units can't handle the Dmax with even a 60hp tune.
 
Last edited:

cummins05

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2009
Messages
430
Location
Edmonton
The Ford diesel program since 1982 has been in a partnership with International Harvester, IH has supplied the long block assemblies and then Ford fitted their own injection system to it. The earliest versions were naturally aspirated and had some cavitation problems, they didn't make a lot of power but got phenomenal fuel mileage and outside the cavitation issue were very reliable.

Mid 1995 Ford introduced the PowerStroke which had a new injection system and turbocharger and made some serious torque numbers. They had some minor issues with them with oil leaks and cam sensors, but were a pretty reliable engine and made good power. In mid 1998 they added an intercooler which brought more power yet and introduced it as a '99 model with the SuperDutys.

The engines I refer to are the 6.0 PowerStroke introduced in '03 and the 6.7 which came in '07. Both were designed to meet the EPA requirements of those periods, the 7.3 couldn't be made to conform. The 6.0 had a variable vane turbo which had a habit of grenading and contaminating the engine crankcase. Fred Pickering has had 3 of them that I know of in his fleet blow, one on the way home from the dealer brand new! In the quest to play the horsepower race with the other manufacturers, they have raised the RPMs beyond what IH ever intended and have seen a high failure rate as a result. I've driven an IH 4200 with the 365 which is the same engine as the 6.0 PowerStroke built to IH specs and it runs very well. Ford tweaked them for horsepower numbers and lost reliability as a result.

The 6.7 has a dual turbocharger system in place to meet emissions requirements and generates a tremendous amount of heat under the hood. It also has an exhaust gas recirculation emissions system that regenerates by injecting raw fuel into the exhaust to burn out collected soot. There were problems with this system too, if you look around youtube you'll find videos of these trucks shooting flames out the tailpipe as they regenerate. There has been a pretty high failure rate on these engines too, and a number of them have caught fire due to the high heat retention.

Sorry steve its a 6.4 in the ford with egr and dpf the egr exhaust gas recirculation pipes exhaust gas from the up pipe before the turbo back into the intake. it does not rejen with fuel. The dpf filter when getting restricted has the computer dump another pulse(regen) of fuel into the exhaust stroke to raise the egt's to burn the particulates out.
The new ford engine is supposed to be 6.7L just like the current cummins
 

Steve Frazier

Founder
Staff member
Joined
Oct 30, 2003
Messages
6,608
Location
LaGrangeville, N.Y.
Thanks 05cummins, I got all these displacements a little twisted when typing. I'm not the best on the emissions equipment, thanks for the clarification.
 

cummins05

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2009
Messages
430
Location
Edmonton
Hope i didnt come off as a smart _ _ _ there steve i just spend alot of time talking bout DPF and egr deletes at the races cause one of my sponsors is a performance shop
 

Steve Frazier

Founder
Staff member
Joined
Oct 30, 2003
Messages
6,608
Location
LaGrangeville, N.Y.
Not at all, I'm usually a stickler for details. I knew EGR is exhaust gas recirculation, can you tell us what DPF and UP pipe are?

The new trucks will have SCR, Selective Catalytic Reduction where liquid urea (DEF) is injected into the exhaust to convert nitrous oxide to nitrogen and water vapor.

Anyone had enough of emissions abreviations yet???
 

cummins05

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2009
Messages
430
Location
Edmonton
DPF diesel particulate filter it scrubs the fine particles out of the exhaust gas these fiters plug and need to be cleaned this system is automatic when the computer senses a plugging DPF it dumps raw fuel into the cyl on the exhaust stroke witch raises the EGT exhaust gas temp enough to burn the particles in the filter witch is called a dpf filter regen. All fine and dandy but number one the burn off never fully cleans the DPF filter so there is a restriction causing performance loss. 2 its using more fuel up to one litre a minute in a Regen.
so in the end your truck usess more fuel then it did before some regens can last ten to fifteen min. Trucks can regen everyday three times a day or once a month depends on your driving style and Idle time. The aftermarket has developed ways to fool the computer or program it right out of the system so you can remove the DPF and EGR systems on Dodge Ford and GM giving you more power and better fuel economy rmoving the dpf or egr without a fooler or programer capable of deleting the regen will cause your truck to A go into a limp mode or B regen all the time.

An uppipe on a ford and gm is just a pipe that comes up from the exhaust manifolds to the turbo witch is in the v of the motor.

Sorry if there are spellin errors or somthing dont make total sense im on alot of pain killers right now
 

mudmaker

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 10, 2009
Messages
136
Location
Colorado
One thing I was reading on the 6.7 Ford was it has a egr bypass for when the motor is warming up. I wonder what would happen if you let it bypass all the time. I know a common mod on the 6.0's is an egr delete. If Ford has designed a bypass there may be no need for a delete. The urea injection is suppose to make the dpf much smaller as well so mileage should be much better.

I still drive my 02's with the 7.3's so I haven't messed with egr's or dpf's yet, but the time will come when I have to get a new pickup. I just wish they still made the Excursion! My wife doesn't know what she will replace it with when the time comes.
 

cummins05

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2009
Messages
430
Location
Edmonton
All newer trucks with EGR have a valve to cycle the circulayion on and off during cold starts and other paramiters. Problem is without a programer aor fooler box to make the computer think its workin it will throw engine codes then start to derate the engines power. If you just unplug it it will read the circut as open and not functioning. There are no free or easy mods to these motors.

We will have to see what the urea systems are like but i assume the cost of ownership will increase with that as well urea aint guna be free and one more system with problems to maitain.

my old 99 cummins gets a true 25mph and there telling me a 6.4 ford that gets 10 on the hwy is better for the enviroment getting more then twice as bad fuel economy.
I think its just better for oil companys pocket books
 

JDOFMEMI

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2007
Messages
3,074
Location
SoCal
Like 05cummins above said, I can't understand how we are helping emmisions by burning WAY more fuel.
Since 1995, every truck I have bought got less mpg than the last one, and also had more repairs done to it than the one before it. I drive 3/4 ton 4X4 diesels, and my 95 dodge got average 19mpg
wet to a 99 Ford 7.3, got 17 mpg
03 Ford 7.3, 15 mpg
06 Ford with a 6.0, 13mpg
I refuse to buy a Ford 6.4. I have friends with them, getting 11 mpg

My company had 6 6.0 Fords. after 3 1/2 years, only one had not had major engine problems, and it got sold recently when it showed the first signs of the trouble the others have had.
One has had 2 engines under warranty, 1 had 3, and got replaced under the lemon law before it had 25,000 miles.
The other 3 have all had the fuel system replaced at least once, one of them 2 or 3 times, I forget.
As far as I am concerned, they are a total disaster.
Talking to the Ford dealer mechanics, and they say the 6.4 has 2 to 3 times the trouble of the 6.0!!!!
I will never own one of them. I am thinking of buying older used trucks with low miles instead of new. They just keep getting worse, and it is a shame, becase the rest of the truck is really nice.
Maybe Fords new engine will be better, but I will not even think of buying one untill it is proven for a few years.
 

cummins05

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2009
Messages
430
Location
Edmonton
Take a 6.0 out of a school bus they run good dont blow head gasket put that same motor in a superduty let ford tune it and you know what there like so does this tell you ford knows what there doin. Same as dodge puting 10 micron fuel filters on common rail trucks that can only handle a 4 to 5 micron particle in the fuel system
 

Deeretime

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 12, 2009
Messages
344
Location
High River Alberta
Occupation
superintendent
The Ford diesel program since 1982 has been in a partnership with International Harvester, IH has supplied the long block assemblies and then Ford fitted their own injection system to it. The earliest versions were naturally aspirated and had some cavitation problems, they didn't make a lot of power but got phenomenal fuel mileage and outside the cavitation issue were very reliable.

Mid 1995 Ford introduced the PowerStroke which had a new injection system and turbocharger and made some serious torque numbers. They had some minor issues with them with oil leaks and cam sensors, but were a pretty reliable engine and made good power. In mid 1998 they added an intercooler which brought more power yet and introduced it as a '99 model with the SuperDutys.

The engines I refer to are the 6.0 PowerStroke introduced in '03 and the 6.7 which came in '07. Both were designed to meet the EPA requirements of those periods, the 7.3 couldn't be made to conform. The 6.0 had a variable vane turbo which had a habit of grenading and contaminating the engine crankcase. Fred Pickering has had 3 of them that I know of in his fleet blow, one on the way home from the dealer brand new! In the quest to play the horsepower race with the other manufacturers, they have raised the RPMs beyond what IH ever intended and have seen a high failure rate as a result. I've driven an IH 4200 with the 365 which is the same engine as the 6.0 PowerStroke built to IH specs and it runs very well. Ford tweaked them for horsepower numbers and lost reliability as a result.

The 6.7 has a dual turbocharger system in place to meet emissions requirements and generates a tremendous amount of heat under the hood. It also has an exhaust gas recirculation emissions system that regenerates by injecting raw fuel into the exhaust to burn out collected soot. There were problems with this system too, if you look around youtube you'll find videos of these trucks shooting flames out the tailpipe as they regenerate. There has been a pretty high failure rate on these engines too, and a number of them have caught fire due to the high heat retention.



dude its a 6.4L and they dont shoot flames ne more they fixed that
 

cummins05

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2009
Messages
430
Location
Edmonton
the flames out the tail pipe was caused by the exhaust stroke injection pulse having to long of duration simple glitch easily fixed by a flash
 

Dozerboy

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2006
Messages
2,232
Location
TX
Occupation
Operator
I don't know how its doesn't make scene the burning more fuel can decrease pollution. Does it sound intelligent well no, but emissions for diesel is just like emission for gassers in the 70s. It blew, but it will get better. I hope the addition of Urea can help the mileage out some it shouldn't take much to of set the cost. I hear the Urea on the Baby Dmax would have to be serviced every oil change. The Dmax goes 10-12k on an oil change not that the Baby will to but...

What is BS is that diesel emissions are nothing comparative to to gassers without this junk.
 

4x4_Welder

Member
Joined
Sep 7, 2009
Messages
21
Location
Rexburg, ID
What kills diesels is the smoker crowd. The greenies see these guys out there with twin 6" stacks on a late 90s Ram, belching tons of smoke, then suddenly all diesels are these noisy dirty things. While NOx is a problem with diesels, it's just as much of a problem with the pet hydrogen engines. At least biodiesel is a net-gain process, rather than hydrogen or alcohol.
What's funny is that nearly any emissions equipment, except for an EGR and PCV in a gas engine, decreases fuel mileage.
 

cummins05

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2009
Messages
430
Location
Edmonton
you would meen like this
YouTube - NADP August Blackout 2009 vid 1
and its not the greenies doing it to stock trucks cause of this i they know we just take that stuff off to
its just a money grab from oil companys funding the epa so to make more stringent regs and then making deals with auto makers to use systems that burn more fuel
 

rwatkins

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 14, 2008
Messages
108
Location
pennsylvania
What kills diesels is the smoker crowd. The greenies see these guys out there with twin 6" stacks on a late 90s Ram, belching tons of smoke, then suddenly all diesels are these noisy dirty things. While NOx is a problem with diesels, it's just as much of a problem with the pet hydrogen engines. At least biodiesel is a net-gain process, rather than hydrogen or alcohol.
What's funny is that nearly any emissions equipment, except for an EGR and PCV in a gas engine, decreases fuel mileage.

Why do you have to pick on the old dodges. I see more new trucks out there blowin smoke than old dodges. The new truck you just throw a chip on it and put your foot to the floor. Today alone i saw 2 ford 6.0h no's belching smoke as the floored it by us while we were working on the side of the highway. I try and keep my smoke for the track with the puller. But no matter what its all goin down hill now. Emissions get tighter, trucks get more exp. fuel gets more exp. and the govnt gets worse and worse everyday.
 

4x4_Welder

Member
Joined
Sep 7, 2009
Messages
21
Location
Rexburg, ID
The early 24v Cummins were some of the first diesel pullers to be exploited. Before that, it was mostly supercharged gas V8s and gas V8-based engines.
 
Top