• Thank you for visiting HeavyEquipmentForums.com! Our objective is to provide industry professionals a place to gather to exchange questions, answers and ideas. We welcome you to register using the "Register" icon at the top of the page. We'd appreciate any help you can offer in spreading the word of our new site. The more members that join, the bigger resource for all to enjoy. Thank you!

Choice of three car haulers

mbavers

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 11, 2011
Messages
272
Location
homer alaska
I will mostly use for supplies, lumber, etc, but will occasionally need to haul a car. I want a 16ft, 7000lb gvw (about 5200lb load), dual axle, dual brake. I have narrowed it down to: Diamond C, C&B, and PJ. They're similar, with significant differences. The PJ has the weakest looking crossmembers (2.5 X 2.5 X 3/16 angle iron, vs sturdier channels or box beams for the others. Frames are either 5" or 4" channel (I think either one would do). I can't decide, except I don't like the PJ crossmembers (too much chance for the vertical side to bend under load. Total cost, with spare, will be between $3800 and $4700, due to cost of shipping to AK. Any advice appreciated.
 

NepeanGC

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 18, 2017
Messages
203
Location
Ottawa, Ontario
Occupation
#dirtherder
I've never regretted buying too sturdy of a trailer...within reason of course. Trucks gotta be able to tow it.

Having had a couple of 3500lb axle trailers, I'd personally never get one again. I bought a 14k gvw trailer 4 years ago now, and although a bit more $$ up front, the brakes are bigger, the axles are stronger, and the tires are significantly less puncture prone. Not sure how the cdl laws are in AK, but maybe even a 10k/9900lbs, would be leaps and bounds better than a 3.5k axle setup.

With the salt we use on the roads here, I hate trailers with box/tube structure. They always rot from the inside out. All else being equal, channel is generally my preference, stronger than angle, easy to clean and inspect, without the drawbacks of box/tubing.

Another thing I'd look in to, being as you're on the the ocean - Does anyone sell a hot dipped galvanized trailer? They're very popular around here, and generally only costs a few bucks more than a painted trailer, but last a lot longer without all the headaches and cost of paint.
 

56wrench

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 4, 2016
Messages
2,106
Location
alberta
IMO any hollow or square tubing in a trailer frame is more likely to crack or break under the constant flexing and twisting. channel iron and channel iron/ angle iron or I-beam construction allows more flexing before failure.
 

DMiller

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 21, 2010
Messages
16,559
Location
Hermann, Missouri
Occupation
Cheap "old" Geezer
Even a Galvanized subjected to Salts will end up corrupting, anyplace the galvanized is thin will disappear quick and begin that process of decay. I liked having zinc chromate primed steel then paint over as does slow the rust process considerably but does cost considerably more. My current trailers are Channel and Angle constructs, would not have Box section frames.
 

mbavers

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 11, 2011
Messages
272
Location
homer alaska
I've never regretted buying too sturdy of a trailer...within reason of course. Trucks gotta be able to tow it.

Having had a couple of 3500lb axle trailers, I'd personally never get one again. I bought a 14k gvw trailer 4 years ago now, and although a bit more $$ up front, the brakes are bigger, the axles are stronger, and the tires are significantly less puncture prone. Not sure how the cdl laws are in AK, but maybe even a 10k/9900lbs, would be leaps and bounds better than a 3.5k axle setup.

With the salt we use on the roads here, I hate trailers with box/tube structure. They always rot from the inside out. All else being equal, channel is generally my preference, stronger than angle, easy to clean and inspect, without the drawbacks of box/tubing.

Another thing I'd look in to, being as you're on the the ocean - Does anyone sell a hot dipped galvanized trailer? They're very popular around here, and generally only costs a few bucks more than a painted trailer, but last a lot longer without all the headaches and cost of paint.
I've never regretted buying too sturdy of a trailer...within reason of course. Trucks gotta be able to tow it.


No galvanized, and aluminum too expensive. I won't use in Winter, so salt not a big concern. Good point about the tubing; I was hoping maybe rust proofed inside, but very doubtful. Only towing with Tundra, so need to keep weight down. Most of my towing will be only a few thousand lbs, and I might switch to load range D tires.
 

mowingman

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 10, 2010
Messages
1,236
Location
SE Ohio
Occupation
Retired
I have an 18' Sundowner, all aluminum car trailer. I looked at the P&J and did not like them due to the reasons mentioned. I don't know anything about the other brands. However, I agree, since you are spending a lot on shipping, I would get the highest GVW you can afford right now. BTW, my aluminum trailer was about $6,000, and I pulled it home from the dealer. Glad I do not live in Alaska.
 

mbavers

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 11, 2011
Messages
272
Location
homer alaska
I've never regretted buying too sturdy of a trailer...within reason of course. Trucks gotta be able to tow it.

Having had a couple of 3500lb axle trailers, I'd personally never get one again. I bought a 14k gvw trailer 4 years ago now, and although a bit more $$ up front, the brakes are bigger, the axles are stronger, and the tires are significantly less puncture prone. Not sure how the cdl laws are in AK, but maybe even a 10k/9900lbs, would be leaps and bounds better than a 3.5k axle setup.

With the salt we use on the roads here, I hate trailers with box/tube structure. They always rot from the inside out. All else being equal, channel is generally my preference, stronger than angle, easy to clean and inspect, without the drawbacks of box/tubing.

Another thing I'd look in to, being as you're on the the ocean - Does anyone sell a hot dipped galvanized trailer? They're very popular around here, and generally only costs a few bucks more than a painted trailer, but last a lot longer without all the headaches and cost of paint.
 

mbavers

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 11, 2011
Messages
272
Location
homer alaska
I'm having trouble responding to an individual post, so apologies if this doesn't work.

Weight is a factor, as I'm using a Tundra and live in very hilly country. I'll mostly be towing a few thousand lbs, but I might switch to load range D tires.
I agree with box/tube; they should rustproof inside, but welding would probably ruin that anyway. I won't be using it in Winter, so salt shouldn't be a problem.
No galvanized available and aluminum is too expensive.
Thanks!
 

mbavers

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 11, 2011
Messages
272
Location
homer alaska
Even a Galvanized subjected to Salts will end up corrupting, anyplace the galvanized is thin will disappear quick and begin that process of decay. I liked having zinc chromate primed steel then paint over as does slow the rust process considerably but does cost considerably more. My current trailers are Channel and Angle constructs, would not have Box section frames.
Yes, I am ruling out the boxed channels.
 

mbavers

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 11, 2011
Messages
272
Location
homer alaska
I have an 18' Sundowner, all aluminum car trailer. I looked at the P&J and did not like them due to the reasons mentioned. I don't know anything about the other brands. However, I agree, since you are spending a lot on shipping, I would get the highest GVW you can afford right now. BTW, my aluminum trailer was about $6,000, and I pulled it home from the dealer. Glad I do not live in Alaska.

I'm buying locally, so I am, in effect, paying shipping costs to the dealer. I would not buy a trailer without being to inspect it.

I liked the PJ until I saw the angle iron crossmembers. They might figure that a car's tires are close to the crossmember attach points, so not that much bending force, but I may be loading other objects near the center, causing more stress.
 

DMiller

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 21, 2010
Messages
16,559
Location
Hermann, Missouri
Occupation
Cheap "old" Geezer
My 18 footer has 3500 lb axles, four wheel brakes, built by Trailerman. Bought it decent and used for $2k, had to replace the beaten up fenders do a bit of rewire lighting bought a full set of decals so can repaint and had two bad floor boards. Trailerman is manufactured north of me by a 100 miles or so and knew how built, knew it to be a good one for my purposes.

http://www.trailermantrailers.net/
 

mbavers

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 11, 2011
Messages
272
Location
homer alaska
My 18 footer has 3500 lb axles, four wheel brakes, built by Trailerman. Bought it decent and used for $2k, had to replace the beaten up fenders do a bit of rewire lighting bought a full set of decals so can repaint and had two bad floor boards. Trailerman is manufactured north of me by a 100 miles or so and knew how built, knew it to be a good one for my purposes.

http://www.trailermantrailers.net/

Never saw one in my area.
 

DMiller

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 21, 2010
Messages
16,559
Location
Hermann, Missouri
Occupation
Cheap "old" Geezer
Would not figure as had. Usually Local dealer sales, some in a five state area but not much further. This was as bought. Also replaced all tires just after got, six lug 15s wheelsIMG_1584.JPG .
 

DMiller

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 21, 2010
Messages
16,559
Location
Hermann, Missouri
Occupation
Cheap "old" Geezer
Pretty handy for me, haul scrap, lumber, misc odds/ends parts/components and a few odd tractors on it from time to time.
 

old-iron-habit

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 22, 2012
Messages
4,233
Location
Moose Lake, MN
Occupation
Retired Cons't. Supt./Hospitals
I would go with a 18 footer. With a 16 you will find yourself fighting a short trailer more often than you would like to. The extra couple ft. is cheap and invaluable when you want to stich a full bed 4 door truck on it.
 
Top