I fully support reporting near misses.......provided they are actual near misses. Simply reporting for the sake of generating paperwork to justify having a reporting system in place is pointless, in my opinion. If there's something worth reporting, then there's the potential for rectifying the problem, which could possibly save someone from getting hurt.
We have a Field Level Risk (FLRA) system where I work. In concept, it sounds like a great idea, but in reality, I feel it has an almost negative effect. We are required to fill out an FLRA card for every task we perform. If you are caught working without a filled out and signed card for the task you are working on, you will be subject to disciplinary action. The cards require you to list the tasks you will be undertaking, then all the potential hazards, and the steps you will take to mitigate each of those potential hazards. These are all handwritten, not a form where you circle a selection from a list. The biggest issue, is that it has to be done for every task. Not just tasks that are not a regular occurance, or something you are not familiar, but every task. So,if I have to perform shovel pit checks on three different shovels, then I have three seperate cards to fill out. In theory, this sounds like a good idea, but reality seems to disprove that. It seems that in most cases, the people filling out the cards, think only long enough to figure out something to write down, then switch off their brains because "I did my FLRA, so I don't have to think about it anymore.". I prefer to constantly watch for any hazards that may show up, and deal with them as we go, but this process wants you to think of anything that could happen before you start. Unfortunately, like I said, I find this causes most people to stop looking for hazards once the initial assessment is done, and in the worst case, simply write something down for the sake of having something written down. That seems somewhat counterproductive to me. But, that keeps safety busy, so they're happy.