• Thank you for visiting HeavyEquipmentForums.com! Our objective is to provide industry professionals a place to gather to exchange questions, answers and ideas. We welcome you to register using the "Register" icon at the top of the page. We'd appreciate any help you can offer in spreading the word of our new site. The more members that join, the bigger resource for all to enjoy. Thank you!

Giant mining excavators

miningtrucks

Active Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2008
Messages
42
Location
EFFINGHAM
i found these awesome photos of giant mining excavators and they aren't mine but i give credit to the orignal photographer
first up is the massive Liebherr R9800 and next to a truck
next is the awesome Komatsu PC8000 in backhoe form
next is Komatsu PC5500 backhoe
last is not much of a giant but it is the awesome Komatsu PC1600 backhoe
 

Attachments

  • 07052008040.jpg
    07052008040.jpg
    42.8 KB · Views: 52,746
  • PC8000-3-2__Medium_.jpg
    PC8000-3-2__Medium_.jpg
    38 KB · Views: 25,965
  • Bagger_von_vorne_001__Medium_.jpg
    Bagger_von_vorne_001__Medium_.jpg
    53 KB · Views: 12,720
  • PC1600_1.jpg
    PC1600_1.jpg
    65.4 KB · Views: 12,720

diggerop

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 18, 2008
Messages
159
Location
QLD , Australia
Occupation
Plant operator, coal mining/ 25 years
That Komatsu has a trailing electrical cable. Are they trying electric power in a hydraulic machine??
 

alco

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 7, 2006
Messages
1,289
Location
here
That Komatsu has a trailing electrical cable. Are they trying electric power in a hydraulic machine??

I wouldn't say they're trying it, electric powered hydraulic machines have been around for many years and are more common than you may think. Personally, I think it defeats the biggest advantage the hydraulic machines have, and that's ease of mobility.....but that's just me.

Brian
 

dozerdave

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2009
Messages
182
Location
Philippines
Hi miningtrucks,

Super pictures.

I operated a 992A in a spillway years ago and the big gun there was a Bucyrus 280B which was electric. There was no hydraulics on the shovel, all cables. The electric line was attached to towers and was never a serious problem. The support equipment passed under the elec. line. I don't remember the bucket size on the 280B but there was no way the 992 would load truck for truck with the shovel.
 

Ross

Senior Member
Joined
May 29, 2007
Messages
357
Location
In the Rockies
I wouldn't say they're trying it, electric powered hydraulic machines have been around for many years and are more common than you may think. Personally, I think it defeats the biggest advantage the hydraulic machines have, and that's ease of mobility.....but that's just me.

Brian

100% agree .. Thats one of the advantages of the Hydro machine is it's mobility ..

Anyhow .. so nice pics .. :cool:
 

miningtrucks

Active Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2008
Messages
42
Location
EFFINGHAM
found a picture of the R996 backhoe being transported and thought you guys would like to see it
 

Attachments

  • R996-THIESS.jpg
    R996-THIESS.jpg
    62.5 KB · Views: 30,189

blueman

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 3, 2009
Messages
45
Location
NC
Looks like it's available in either diesel or electric versions.

http://www.komatsuamerica.com/?p=equipment&f1=view&prdt_id=986#info

Ed

As someone else said, big cable shovels have been electric a long time.
It's been an available option on hydraulic shovels for a long time, too, but really took off the last 5-8 years. It reduces mobility for sure, but for coal/lignite mines with the powerplant right next door offering cheap juice, it offers a hell of an economic advantage and a very long service life.
 

JDOFMEMI

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2007
Messages
3,074
Location
SoCal
i hope your not serious :)

That mack is actually assisting by pushing. You can see they've put weight on the rear of it for traction.

I'm pretty sure there was just a hint of sarcasm at work there in Hendricks statement

Don't take it too seriously.:drinkup
 

95zIV

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2006
Messages
795
Location
Cincinnati, OH
Occupation
RR Contractor Super.
Don't worry Hendrik,

I understood immediately what you meant, besides you hafta go with the old saying:

It's the unlucky dog that gets a new Mack, or any Mack. :tong
 

Chris5500

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2009
Messages
217
Location
Australia
Occupation
Plant Mechanic
Looks like it's available in either diesel or electric versions.

http://www.komatsuamerica.com/?p=equipment&f1=view&prdt_id=986#info

Ed

One of the main advantages of the electric drive excavators is the extended life of components such as the pump drive gear boxes (Pump distributor gear, PTO, whatever tickles your fancy) and the hydraulic pumps due to the absensce of the surge you would commonly get from an engine. Off the top of my head a PC8000 generally gets between 14-16,000 hours out of the life of a main hydraulic pump (The factory reckons 18,000 but I have yet to see one) with the electric drive you would probably get around the 20,000. And just for the sake of people interested, Liebherr 996's get around about the same life out of a pump (The pumps are exactly the same make and model on both the Komatsu PC5500-6 as the Liebherr 996 - Rexroth A4VSO 500 LR3DN / 30L) ;)
 

alco

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 7, 2006
Messages
1,289
Location
here
The problem with that, is that a hydraulic machine needs to be more mobile to compensate for it's inherent lack of reach. Therefore, to be able to produce effectively, it needs to be free of it's trail cable and able to move quickly around the pit. While the electric drive may extend component life, it tends to slow the machine down production wise. That was why I was saying the biggest advantage is mobility. Now, which one balances out to be more cost effective? I really have no idea. I guess it would depend on the mine and all of it's requirements. I would have to say though, if it was me, I would tend to favour electric driven cable machines with a diesel powered hydraulic machine or two thrown in for utility work. That of course assumes that the mine life would be long enough to warrant going to cable shovels.
 

Chris5500

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2009
Messages
217
Location
Australia
Occupation
Plant Mechanic
I agree there alco, my personal preference would be a diesel hydraulic, like you said, kinda defeats the whole object of mobility, especially on a backhoe which typically sit on a bench which is rough, blasted rock or when climbing the bench, cant be good for the cable reel, different story on a face shovel though.
 

alco

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 7, 2006
Messages
1,289
Location
here
No doubt, I know how much of a pain it is to drag a cable around with a shovel, and I spend most days on a diesel RH200, so I tend to think the same for the shovel as well.
 

Chris5500

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2009
Messages
217
Location
Australia
Occupation
Plant Mechanic
All of the PC8000-6 E's (4 in total) at Cerrejon Coal mine in Colombia have been converted from backhoe configuration to face shovel configurations.

Here's a pic of another, newer PC8000-6 E face shovel at a La Loma Coal mine in Colombia the shovel is owned by the Drummond Company, Inc. which is a privately owned company based in Birmingham, Alabama, United States.
 

Attachments

  • PC 8000 Drummond _Medium_.jpg
    PC 8000 Drummond _Medium_.jpg
    48.8 KB · Views: 3,520
  • Drummond2 _Medium_.jpg
    Drummond2 _Medium_.jpg
    40.5 KB · Views: 3,192
  • IMG_0153_1_ _Medium_.jpg
    IMG_0153_1_ _Medium_.jpg
    50.8 KB · Views: 4,602
Top