Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 46

Thread: Old time Logging

  1. #31
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Northwest
    Posts
    2,175
    Banks,
    Nehalem is the name of the area in Oregon where the photo was taken.

    The logging industry was alway very innovative in finding ways to move heavy logs out of the woods. I don't recognize the machine but would bet someone has taken an ag machine and modified it carry logs. It doesn't look like they were tied on so I would be kind of nervous about running the rig.

    It is a good photo.

  2. #32
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Belgium
    Posts
    3
    Tanks very much for the information John C. It's just I am very interested in tracked machines. But when I see this photo I though there is nothing new under the sun. If you see the tracked farm tractors of today they where around 75 years ago. In the text with the photo they mention 22 mph. It's very impressive. Its seem to me that the tracks or the same at with the tracked dirt wagons of that same time.

  3. #33
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Fortuna Ca
    Posts
    14
    Quote Originally Posted by Northart View Post
    Here's one from Eureka, Calif .
    Good to see a photo from my neck of the woods. I wish my Grandpa would get his old collection of photos out for me from when he was still logging.
    IUOE local 3

  4. #34
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    New Mexico
    Posts
    6
    During the early 60's I set chokers out in the Olympic peninsula in the last permanent camp. It was in the rain forest and it rained all the time. We walked on boardwalks in the camp with our corks on. The mess hall had everything to eat you could want. You grabbed a sack lunch on the way out the door. Most of the logs (big ones) were in the mud so we set a small charge under the log to blow out the mud and then jumped down into the water and set the choker. You stood on the log as the charge blew as that was the only safe place to be. Also worked high line on Mt. Rainier with a 600hp. tower yarder and 1 1/2 main line, pretty big logs.

  5. #35
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    81
    Quote Originally Posted by AtlasRob View Post
    Heres the picture, its titled Nehalem, Oregon.


    Attachment 34582


    Pretty sure that tractor is a Cletrac.

  6. #36
    Senior Member Wolf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    California
    Posts
    1,117
    great old picutures. where have all the big trees gone?

  7. #37
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    NSW AUSTRALIA
    Posts
    122

    Hyster

    A couple of pix out of an old Hyster book.
    Attached Images Attached Images   

  8. #38
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Port Moody, B.C.
    Posts
    46
    I wonder what the safety inspectors would have to say about the equipment pictured. No hard hats, no guarding, no ROP cab, as well as more than I would possibly know.

    They did all the logging and didn't give it a second thought.

    The early logging was done with small equipment and now is done with large equipment ( multiple-tasking) when any logging is done.

    Can anyone imagine sleeping 20 or more in a single room? Etcetras.

  9. #39
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Blue Lake
    Posts
    144

    They are locked up in parks!

    Quote Originally Posted by Wolf View Post
    great old picutures. where have all the big trees gone?
    I spent 20 years logging old growth Redwood and Douglas Fir. At the time our company foresters calculated that at the rate we were logging we had at least 100 years of timber supply. Then the whacko's in power in Washington DC decided it would be a good idea to spend the taxpayer's money to lock them up forever. Ever wonder where the nearing 15 TRILLION dollar national debt came from? This kind of thinking has us where we sit. We have well over 100,000 acres of old growth timber in parks up here. The last Redwood will never be cut. They are beautiful trees, beautiful to look at.....beautiful to use.
    Last edited by Redwood Climber; 06-04-2011 at 11:44 AM. Reason: clarification

  10. #40
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Blue Lake
    Posts
    144
    Quote Originally Posted by danieltree View Post
    Great pics. I doubt that technology would help get those giants down.
    Actually technology did speed up the process of cutting, logging, hauling and milling those giants. Chainsaws with bars of 6' and longer sped up the cutting. Trees that took days to cut before chainsaws, now (in the 60's - 90's) only took hours. Wrestling a log 8' in diameter now only took minutes to get it to the landing. Sometimes that was with a huge Skagit BU199 or a Washingtono 217 yarder using 1 3/8 to 1 1/2 cables. Other times it may have been a D9G or a D8 46A dragging (skidding) logs to the landing. 988 front end loaders could lift this 8' x 16' log onto a short logger........sometimes it was a real rassliing match......but off it went to the mill being pulled by 400 or more horsepower.......
    Last edited by Redwood Climber; 06-04-2011 at 12:01 PM. Reason: clarification

  11. #41
    COPPA KW850&T800H's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Tete Jaune/Valemount BC
    Posts
    239
    Anyone on here see the Sparmatic I posted in another thread? be a great thing to put here, but if you saw it in the other thread, I won't bother.
    -The Young Snag-

  12. #42
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Eureka, California
    Posts
    65
    Quote Originally Posted by Canevari Timber View Post
    Good to see a photo from my neck of the woods. I wish my Grandpa would get his old collection of photos out for me from when he was still logging.
    Quote Originally Posted by Redwood Climber View Post
    Actually technology did speed up the process of cutting, logging, hauling and milling those giants. Chainsaws with bars of 6' and longer sped up the cutting. Trees that took days to cut before chainsaws, now (in the 60's - 90's) only took hours. Wrestling a log 8' in diameter now only took minutes to get it to the landing. Sometimes that was with a huge Skagit BU199 or a Washingtono 217 yarder using 1 3/8 to 1 1/2 cables. Other times it may have been a D9G or a D8 46A dragging (skidding) logs to the landing. 988 front end loaders could lift this 8' x 16' log onto a short logger........sometimes it was a real rassliing match......but off it went to the mill being pulled by 400 or more horsepower.......
    Hey neighbors! Good to see a couple more locals on here.

    I'd be curious to know exactly where the pic from Eureka was taken.

  13. #43
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Blue Lake
    Posts
    144

    Saved by the Timber Heritage Association...........

    Quote Originally Posted by Northart View Post
    Here's one from Eureka, Calif .


    I'm not positive, but the Timber Heritage Association in Samoa, California has a CAT 60 equipped with a winch that looks exactly like the one you posted........ they believe it is the first logging Cat in Humboldt County. It is in amazing condition..........looks like you could fire it up & start dragging logs right now. It will be on display this weekend.

  14. #44
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Eureka, California
    Posts
    65
    Thanks for that. Looks like I'll be stopping in over there this weekend.

  15. #45
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Roseville, Calif
    Posts
    16
    Back a few posts "Banks" asked about a tracked vehicle pulling a load of logs, which was in a photo entitled "Nehalem".

    I suspect this was someones attempt to modify a tracked vehicle for higher speed hauling in lieu of trucks and this was taken a bit after WW II. Looking at the vehicle, it appears to be on a tank type chassis, because of the multiple road tires needed for higher speeds. These chassis designs were tried on Vickers tractors from England as I recall, but were not successful for dozing and pulling heavy loads.

    My best guess, as I have never seen a tractor in this configuration and have been looking at them since the 1950's.

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •