• Thank you for visiting HeavyEquipmentForums.com! Our objective is to provide industry professionals a place to gather to exchange questions, answers and ideas. We welcome you to register using the "Register" icon at the top of the page. We'd appreciate any help you can offer in spreading the word of our new site. The more members that join, the bigger resource for all to enjoy. Thank you!

New chains popping on D3

lantraxco

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2009
Messages
7,704
Location
Elsewhen
D4K, D3K, D4G, D3G, D4C, D3C SEALED AND LUBRICATED TRACK
LARGE STEPPED BUSHING
36 SECTION: STD (D3, D3B), LGP (D3)
37 SECTION: STD (D3C/B, D4B), LGP (D3C), SPL (D3B)
39 SECTION: STD (D3C/B, D4C), LGP (D3G, D3C/B, D4C, D3), XL (D3G/C)
41 SECTION: XL/LGP (D3K), XL (D4G/C), LGP (D4G))
43 SECTION: XL/LGP D4K
6.125" (155.6 mm) PITCH - 9/16" BOLT

D3C/B, D4C/B, D3 SEALED AND LUBRICATED TRACK
36 SECTION: STD (D3, D3B), LGP (D3)
37 SECTION: STD (D3C/B, D4B), LGP (D3C), SPL (D3B)
39 SECTION: STD (D3C/B, D4C), LGP (D3C/B, D4C, D3), XL (D3C)
41 SECTION: D4C (XL)
6.125" (155.6 mm) PITCH - 9/16" BOLT

D3 SEALED AND LUBRICATED TRACK
FORMER, STRAIGHT WALL BUSHING, SPLIT MASTER LINKS
6.125" (155.6 mm) PITCH -- 9/16" BOLT


D3G, D4G, D3C, D4C, D4B, D3B, D3 SEGMENTS
(USE WITH LARGE STEPPED BUSHING)

(PER SIDE) QUANTITY PART NUMBER
Sprocket Segment (Tough Steel) (5 Tooth) 5 190-7396
Adapter Ring 1 6Y-5499
Bolt 25 9W-9265
Nut 25 8H-5724
Washer 25 5P-8245


D3C, D4C, D4B, D3B, D3 SPROCKETS FORMER MODEL
(PER SIDE) QUANTITY PART NUMBER
Sprocket Assembly (25 Tooth) 1 8Y-0622
Rim (25 Tooth) 1 6Y-1244
 

lantraxco

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2009
Messages
7,704
Location
Elsewhen
From the Caterpillar-Custom-Track-Service-Handbook, 15th Edition, the following bushings are used for 6.125 pitch D3:

Straight Bushings 1.95"

Small Stepped Bushings 1.97"

Large Stepped Bushings 2.13"

I couldn't find my book, finally found one online to look at.
 

Old Magnet

Senior Member
Joined
May 11, 2010
Messages
2,014
Location
Corralitos, California
OK, thanks. My info is not that late.
When I looked on line I still see 1.85" dia. for SALT tracks with straight bushings.

Looks like this case has some miss matched components as previously mentioned.
 

Old Magnet

Senior Member
Joined
May 11, 2010
Messages
2,014
Location
Corralitos, California
I'm a little slow but still digging. When I went locking for sprockets they all seem to be the same except it does state as you previously mentioned. "Large stepped bushings are to be used with 190-7396 segments and 6Y-5499 adapter ring". I suspect they have a different pitch diameter to accommodate the 2.31" bushings.
I'm still looking for sprocket dimensions. Do you have that info?
 

lantraxco

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2009
Messages
7,704
Location
Elsewhen
OK, thanks. My info is not that late.
When I looked on line I still see 1.85" dia. for SALT tracks with straight bushings.

Looks like this case has some miss matched components as previously mentioned.

It's crazy, I think you can still get all three, plus the old sealed tracks with 1/2" bolt holes. Not to mention a System One track!
 

Old Magnet

Senior Member
Joined
May 11, 2010
Messages
2,014
Location
Corralitos, California
Dimensions might be available under Cats "Undercarriage Information System" but it tells me I must have windows 7 to access. Can somebody have a look see that has later computer operating system?
 

Willie B

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2016
Messages
4,075
Location
Mount Tabor VT
Occupation
Electrician
I told you I spent the night at Holiday Inn Express! On a sidetrack, does anyone have a good way to get rid of bed bugs?
 

JDOFMEMI

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2007
Messages
3,074
Location
SoCal
.......
If the former link groups were fitted with 1.85" diameter bushes and the new one are fitted with 2.1" diameter bushes then unless the new sprockets that were installed have a slightly larger pitch circle for the teeth (unlikely) thus slightly increasing the pitch,.....

I think we are saying essentially the same thing, but saying it differently. One way or another, the sprockets and bushings are not matching one another.
 

8k bill

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 15, 2012
Messages
66
Location
Central Queensland Austrailia
Occupation
Farmer grazier
Some of the crap coming out of Asia at the moment is shocking. I wouldn't be surprised if you got a tape out and measure across the tips of the sprocket you'd get different numbers, fairdinkum the stuff I've seen you would only use for net weights. I guess it's the old saying ,you get what you've paid for. But it does look like a mismatch chain and sprocket tho. Bill.
 

Old Magnet

Senior Member
Joined
May 11, 2010
Messages
2,014
Location
Corralitos, California
I think we are saying essentially the same thing, but saying it differently. One way or another, the sprockets and bushings are not matching one another.

Agreed. It would be nice to know what the actual dimensions are. Plenty of specs on the rails but sprocket specs seem harder to come by. I do have specs for the old 1.85" bushing sprockets and rings but would like to add the new info.
 

Nige

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 22, 2011
Messages
29,751
Location
G..G..G..Granville.........!! Fetch your cloth.
OM, if you have the sprocket dimensions for the 1.85" bushing link groups those dimensions might be very useful to the OP because if his sprockets conform to the same dimensions then logically said sprockets could not work with 2.1" bushing link groups because there would not be sufficient space between the teeth to accommodate the larger diameter bushings.
 
Joined
Dec 22, 2008
Messages
15
Location
Willis, Texas
The shop is replacing the chains with my previous dimension bushing, the manager tried to talk me into sending it back my cost and looking at other possible causes, but that was not going to happen, another guy there was telling me someone might have changed the rails and they would look at that also, they were going to do it at their cost if it was related to any fault of theirs but it sounded like a deep hole to me, my old chain was worn out, not yet to destruction, and I didn't have this issue then, I was sure the bushings were the issue and from what I've read here, you knowledgeable guys just reinforce my opinion.

Next parts (hopefully not soon) will be factory, not after market even though they are very pricey, at least it will last and work correctly, next week I should be running and I'll let everyone know how it goes, here's a picture I took today, a top view with pads removed, the bushing alignment to sprocket.
I guess I could have gotten new sprockets but it was a real trick getting them off and on here at home and I don't want to repeat it.IMG_0941.jpg
 

tctractors

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
2,426
Location
Worc U.K.
The Sprockets are pressed on I have done a few of these tractors, its a shame this re-track job has not worked well for you, the large bush chains look very good and would have been a great choice to have kept.
tctractors
 

Truck 505

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 25, 2009
Messages
119
Location
Fairfield, OH
Make sure whoever bolts the pads back on gets the paint off of the top of the chain where the pad sits.
If they don't, the pads will come loose.
 
Top